We do one public NAT per AP. It has worked well so far. I turned in a justification to move everyone to publics and they denied it and gave me another /24 instead.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > Hmmm, I think I will start sending out scary extortion emails because of > DCMA violations. Might make a few bucks. > (Dumb Consumers Money Application). I will let them off the hook for $20 > and give them a full release.... > > *From:* Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 5:42 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee > > > Now if we could just get the automated DMCA "pay up or we sue you" > extortion emailers to realize that Canadian ARIN IP blocks are not subject > to the DMCA. > > All that crap goes to /dev/null... > On Feb 2, 2016 9:31 AM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> What do you thing about charging a fee every time that a customer gets a >> DMCA takedown notice. These notices take time to track down and follow up >> on. If we charged $20 every time it would make it not really worth it to >> pirate that $10 movie. I would think that it should be legal, so long as >> we add it to our customer agreement. Anyone ever thought about this? >> Right now we pass on 5 of them and then make them find a new provider. It >> seems like they would be less likely to hit 5 if they had to pay $20 for >> each one. We really don't want these guys on our network anyway, so no >> sweat if they just cancel. Is anyone out there charging customers a fee >> for these? I know most of you just ignore them, but we like passing them >> on, as it lowers our overall usage. >> >
