`merca! On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
> What you basically just said is that WISPs can't lie about their > coverage areas despite 50% of the maps of the LECs, cablecos, and > larger WISPs being total bullshit. > > Is that correct? > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > > If you claim 100% coverage of a census block or tract and that prevents a > > telco from getting its welfare check, they will do drive testing of the > > whole thing. It has already happened and will happen much more in the > > future as the FCC reduces the unsubsidized competitor coverage percentage > > that takes away their support. Just sayin, claiming more turf than you > > truly serve or can serve in 7-10 days with 10 down and 1 up (soon to > change > > to 25 down) can bring grief. There is no upside to claiming more than > you > > can do on a 477 turf wise or speed wise but there is a big downside. > > > > From: Cameron Crum > > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:10 AM > > To: af@afmug.com > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com? > > > > I'm not sure even areas as small as census blocks groups allow you to be > > surgically accurate. > > > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> > >> I would say that y’all better be getting surgically accurate on your 477 > >> filings. You do sign them under penalty of perjury and there will be > telcos > >> challenging your coverage data. > >> > >> From: Dennis Burgess > >> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 7:07 AM > >> To: af@afmug.com > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com? > >> > >> > >> We also do the Form 477, i.e. broadband deployment data as well as the > >> broadband sub data if your billing system don’t do that anyways. > >> > >> > >> > >> The new APIs allow almost limitless integration with other applications. > >> I.e. you can do a path profile using our data in about 200ms though the > API. > >> Just a matter of the billing/powercode/visp/whatever programming it up > .. > >> > >> > >> > >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > >> > >> den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of David > >> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 8:03 AM > >> To: af@afmug.com > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com? > >> > >> > >> > >> +1000 > >> for this solution.. Unless you invest the time and effort to build a > >> custom solution like towercoverage I dont complain about the number of > >> customers it has brought to us and > >> the countless times it has saved us on truck rolls for invalid service. > >> Also, the EUS data alone is very helpful when determining new site > >> locations. > >> We have 4 new sites going up this year because of that data. > >> U-Verse is our only real competitor in a couple of these areas. If I > could > >> only sell TV i would have it in the bag :) > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 02/03/2016 11:26 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > >> > >> It says it when you log in to towercoverage.com > >> > >> Josh Luthman > >> Office: 937-552-2340 > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >> 1100 Wayne St > >> Suite 1337 > >> Troy, OH 45373 > >> > >> On Feb 4, 2016 12:19 AM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Hmmm.....news to me > >> > >> > >> > >> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Reply message ----- > >> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > >> To: <af@afmug.com> > >> Subject: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com? > >> Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 10:22 PM > >> > >> > >> > >> Uh you can dude. Been a while since they enabled that. > >> > >> Josh Luthman > >> Office: 937-552-2340 > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >> 1100 Wayne St > >> Suite 1337 > >> Troy, OH 45373 > >> > >> On Feb 3, 2016 11:07 PM, "Jeremy" <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> This. So much this. Powercode already has the azimuths, downtilt, gps > >> coordinates, and everything. That should really be the next step is > pulling > >> this info for integration. I have had an active account for like a > year and > >> have never used it. I just don't have the time to add it all. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:29 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller > >> <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> suggestion - take our antenna plots directly from pokeycode, i mean > >> powercode, and automatically populate all our towers in > towercoverage... :) > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> > >> From: Dennis Burgess > >> > >> To: af@afmug.com > >> > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:51 PM > >> > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com? > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for all of the kind comments and suggestions. The pricing is the > >> same as since its inception, we have a dedicated staff to answer > questions > >> as well as take phone calls if you need assistance. Feel free to call or > >> e-mail. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. > >> > >> den...@linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of That One Guy > /sarcasm > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:31 PM > >> To: af@afmug.com > >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com? > >> > >> > >> > >> wow, the pricing is a whole lot more realistic than it used to be, still > >> expensive if you wanted to plot every antenna, but omni will get you the > >> gist of it. hopefully their support is better than a repetitive canned > >> response now > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Josh Luthman < > j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> $25/mo is not much. I strongly recommend signing up for it simply for > the > >> EUS form. If you get ONE customer out of the purchase, you made > money. Any > >> more than that is gravy. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Josh Luthman > >> Office: 937-552-2340 > >> Direct: 937-552-2343 > >> 1100 Wayne St > >> Suite 1337 > >> Troy, OH 45373 > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Tim Reichhart > >> <timreichh...@hometowncable.net> wrote: > >> > >> Who on this list is using towercoverage.com? I want to know how > accurate > >> it is because I have an account now with them and I am doubt its very > >> accurate to give out an good signal from my tower. Because I really hate > >> spending 25 dollars per month and its not going to be accurate. > >> > >> Tim > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
