B5c is ptp sync (only?) and ePMP is ptp and ptmp sync or not, but I wanted to answer the last question at least.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: > But you can't use sync in ePTP mode... here's what I get pinging across a > PTP link with 2.5ms frames, with an average of around 5mbps going across > it. Testing between the Mikrotiks at each end, I can average around 80mbps > on a 20mhz channel. > > 0 10.1.27.25 56 64 10ms > 1 10.1.27.25 56 64 9ms > 2 10.1.27.25 56 64 6ms > 3 10.1.27.25 56 64 8ms > 4 10.1.27.25 56 64 8ms > 5 10.1.27.25 56 64 13ms > 6 10.1.27.25 56 64 8ms > 7 10.1.27.25 56 64 7ms > 8 10.1.27.25 56 64 11ms > 9 10.1.27.25 56 64 8ms > 10 10.1.27.25 56 64 9ms > sent=11 received=11 packet-loss=0% min-rtt=6ms avg-rtt=8ms > max-rtt=13ms > > I wouldn't really put them in the same class as a B5c... the B5c is > capable of a lot more throughput and has some nice gimmicks like being able > to run two separate channels and make changes without taking the link > down... but latency isn't too much different (actually a lot better in ePTP > mode). > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > >> Latency in 2.5ms frames from router through AP to SM (16 subs) doing >> 7-9mbps >> >> > ping 172.16.10.178 >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=14 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=10 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=12 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=12 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=10 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=11 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=11 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=11 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=11 ms >> 172.16.10.178 64 byte ping: ttl=64 time=11 ms >> >> 62x15 mbps speed test in flexible mode >> >> Haven't used a B5c and that's a ptp product...if you do ePTP mode on ePMP >> product you get ~1ms >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> What kind of luck are people having with the ePMP PTP using GPS? >>> Throughput and latency? How do they compare to the Mimosa B5c? >>> >> >> >
