OTARD trumps their lease. You can't agree to violate a federal law in a 
contract. It's like contract hiring of a murder is just as bad as doing the 
murder itself. They're free to put their antenna anywhere that's safe and 
doesn't harm something historically significant as long as it's space they 
control. Their balcony, porch, etc., but not the roof or a common porch. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "George Skorup" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 5:00:00 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 

It is my understand that the resident waives their rights upon signing the 
lease. 


On 2/7/2016 4:25 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: 




Isn't that a clear OTARD violation? 


On Sun, Feb 7, 2016 at 4:08 PM, George Skorup < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Aren't there boxes that do this already? ChannelMaster maybe? OTA DVR + 
Netflix, etc. apps? I don't think you're going to find an IPTv STB with OTA 
built in. 

We're a DISH PCO. We have a SmartBox deployed in one building so far. It has an 
OTA tuner blade installed (8ch I think). Obviously the benefit is that you can 
pull in some locals over the antenna and not tie up sat tuners. We're doing 
clear QAM output, 48ch I believe. But anyway, I'd say the OTA tuner and 
re-transmit in this situation is legal because 1) it's no different than a 
stand-alone OTA system already in the building (we're just converting them to a 
clear QAM channel, no transcoding), and 2) DISH has re-transmit consent for the 
locals anyway. 

Another scenario I'm thinking of.. We're looking at doing GPON in a private 
community of 250+ homes. The association allows ground-mounted sat dishes only, 
nothing on roofs besides our current wireless gear, and no towers. So basically 
nobody can get OTA. What if we fed OTA into the GPON RF wave? Who would know? 
Who would care? We'd be giving the residents a means to get OTA. Most people 
want locals + Netflix anyway. 




On 2/7/2016 11:41 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: 

<blockquote>



In my market, we have (at last count) 24 OTA channels. Not all of them charge, 
but you know the networks and FOX do, so that is at least $4/month/sub cost to 
the company adding those channels to their lineup. Pays for itself in one or 
two years of adding the OTA antenna to the STB. I am sure they must all be 
thinking about it. 




From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 9:19 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 


At a minimum, it would move tens of millions of customers in the coverage area 
of the broadcast towers to OTA instead of retransmitted through the satellite. 
I'm sure at scale, their cost would be cheaper, but a $39 ChannelMaster yagi 
would probably work for most of the population. 

Heck, they wouldn't even have to follow through with it. Just threaten it for 
reduced rates. I'd imagine just the threat of moving however many millions of 
homes (for the big broadcasters) from their retransmission fees would be quite 
enough to settle for a rate decrease. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 






From: "Chuck McCown" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 10:13:28 AM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 




That is a good idea. Put an F connector on the LNB that is designed to pull in 
UHF TV frequencies and transport it to the box. One extra antenna on top. No 
more local retransmission fees (assuming you can get the locals at a decent 
signal level). 




From: Mike Hammett 
Sent: Sunday, February 07, 2016 7:04 AM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 


What I think Chuck was going for was a way to receive them locally so you don't 
have to pay the retransmission fees. To expand upon that, I wonder about 
building the OTA into the dish. 




----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 






From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> 
To: "af" <[email protected]> 
Sent: Saturday, February 6, 2016 6:17:11 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 


Yeah, they do retransmit them over the satellite as well, so most of the locals 
actually show up in the list twice. 



On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 5:53 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote: 

<blockquote>




Can you get locals without the external antenna? 




From: Mathew Howard 
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 4:49 PM 
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 


My Dish Network box does that... there's a built in OTA receiver in the STB, 
and other than program information being missing for some of the sub channels, 
you don't really notice whether the channel is coming from satellite or OTA. 



On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Chuck McCown < [email protected] > wrote: 



<blockquote>




Used to be there were must carry rules for locals. Now it is reversed. 
I have seen these disputes many times over the past 10-15 years. 

I wonder about the economics of building an OTA circuit into the STB. Have the 
installer put up an antenna, wire it up and don’t pay the broadcasters. If it 
was clever enough the user would not even know. Include the locals in the OSD 
and DVR functionality... Hmmm, would work for IPTV systems too... 

Of course everyone cannot always receive all the local OTAs but most could. I 
wonder if you could pay the broadcasters only for the customers that needed 
cable/IPTV deliver of the signal... I guess you could create a non locals tier 
of service and try to put as many on it as possible. 




From: Rory Conaway 
Sent: Saturday, February 06, 2016 3:16 PM 
To: [email protected] 
Subject: [AFMUG] Cox pulls KASW from it's lineup 



KASW is a local channel in the Phoenix area. Apparently there is a dispute over 
the cost of rebroadcasting this local channel when renewing the contract. The 
reason that it’s interesting is they replaced the entire show with an 
explanation of how local channels get to charge for something the broadcast 
over the air for free. It looks like they are going on the offensive and 
something we need to be aware of it if we start looking at broadcasting IP TV. 

Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 
4226 S. 37 th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 
602-426-0542 
[email protected] 
www.triadwireless.net 

“The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort or 
convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge or controversy” – Martin 
Luther King 




</blockquote>




</blockquote>


</blockquote>


</blockquote>


Reply via email to