Yes! I use this one:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.chartcross.gpstestplus&hl=en
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> GPS Status app is pretty cool for testing GPS coverage indoors
> On Feb 8, 2016 7:51 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very accurately, from
>> inside a single floor wood framed house... My oneplus one will pick up 6
>> satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ from any window.
>> Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'.
>>
>> All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building or
>> something like that.
>>
>> I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks to tiny
>> channel size and very basic modulation.
>> On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also fail if the
>>> GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile of where the customer
>>> address is.
>>>
>>> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock.
>>>
>>> bp
>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>
>>> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the user
>>> guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that prevents a VPN?
>>> �
>>> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A address.�
>>> WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class A address?�
>>> Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind Cisco ASA firewall
>>> (which I don't manage).
>>> �
>>> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means something
>>> is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal?
>>>
>>>
>>>
