Does it matter? Once it has lock with 4+ satellites I would think it's all the same.
My Cambium AP and Packetflux gear boots and get's GPS within seconds, not minutes or hours. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:29 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > you guys are comparing a cell phone which uses gps and cellular and wifi > triangulation to a highly accurate GPS used for timing purposes > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 7:39 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> cell booster or gps booster? >> >> Jaime Solorza >> Wireless Systems Architect >> 915-861-1390 >> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net> wrote: >> >>> Pull out a GPS App on your phone and make sure you can actually read the >>> satellites from behind the window (I used 'GPS Test' on Android). We had >>> to install one of these boosters and were troubleshooting why the damn >>> thing wasn't working when I noticed that my phone GPS receiver was working >>> in rooms where the windows were open and not working in rooms where the >>> windows were closed. Building management didn't even know they'd purchased >>> the windows with RF film. >>> >>> >>> >>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network SupportPlexicomm - Internet Solutions | >>> www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net>* >>> *Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax: >>> 1.866.852.4688 <1.866.852.4688>* >>> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <1.866.759.9713> | >>> sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>* >>> >>> >>> >>> ------ Original Message ------ >>> From: "Adam Moffett" <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:50:42 AM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender" >>> >>> >>> It might not be just a matter of getting the location. If they use the >>> 1pps clock from GPS to calibrate an oscillator before they start >>> transmitting, then it would legitimately take 20-30 minutes. >>> >>> Telrad BTS's are like that too. Pisses me off if I ever have to reset >>> the power. >>> >>> >>> On 2/9/2016 12:12 AM, Jason McKemie wrote: >>> >>> For whatever reason, the receivers that they use in some of these don't >>> seem to be "modern" at all. They frequently take an excessively long time >>> to get a lock. >>> >>> On Monday, February 8, 2016, Eric Kuhnke < <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >>> eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very accurately, >>>> from inside a single floor wood framed house... My oneplus one will pick up >>>> 6 satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ from any window. >>>> Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'. >>>> >>>> All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building or >>>> something like that. >>>> >>>> I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks to tiny >>>> channel size and very basic modulation. >>>> On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" < >>>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','part15...@gmail.com');> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also fail if >>>>> the GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile of where the >>>>> customer address is. >>>>> >>>>> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock. >>>>> >>>>> bp >>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>> >>>>> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the user >>>>> guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that prevents a VPN? >>>>> � >>>>> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A address.� >>>>> WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class A address?� >>>>> Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind Cisco ASA firewall >>>>> (which I don't manage). >>>>> � >>>>> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means >>>>> something is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
