I prefer Heliax....I use LMR for pigtails but rarely....we also use Andrew
superflex....
On Feb 10, 2016 5:16 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dude, don't do that. LMR600. We buy it by the thousands of feet. It is
> much easier to run, less prone to damage, and equivalent in loss per
> frequency range.
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016, 4:09 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrew 1/2  Heliax
>> On Feb 10, 2016 2:33 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That's most helpful!  Do you have any idea what kind of cable that was?
>>> I'm assuming anything that will handle 1600 MHz with minimal loss will work?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah, I spoke to my field guy, he said they took an SMB <-> N Connector
>>>> and ran LMR to the roof.  Hope that helps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network SupportPlexicomm - Internet Solutions |
>>>> www.plexicomm.net <http://www.plexicomm.net>*
>>>> *Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 <1.866.759.4678%20x109> | Fax:
>>>> 1.866.852.4688 <1.866.852.4688>*
>>>> *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 <1.866.759.9713> |
>>>> sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>> From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com>
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:42:37 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> It's an SMB connector, but again I find it really had to believe that
>>>> if you stick it outside until you get a good sync and power it down that it
>>>> won't resync indoors, I've never tried inside of a nuclear bunker, but in
>>>> normal houses and offices with tile and metal roofs I've never had one
>>>> issue.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah. Something like that. All I recall is it was ~~ 1/4" or so in
>>>>> diameter. Don't quote me on that. I am disavowing all knowledge.
>>>>>
>>>>> bp
>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2/9/2016 6:37 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> MCM as in MMC? Like MMCX?
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>> On Feb 9, 2016 9:34 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Verizon cell extender (made by Samsung) has a little connector
>>>>>> (don't recall the type, but it's about the size of MCM or so). Put a wire
>>>>>> on the end of the coax, and you're there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bp
>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 10:33 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How did you get a GPS antenna from the roof to the SCS box?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>>>> Suite 1337
>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:28 PM, samuel <sam...@plexicomm.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Verizon's Samsung SCS series 3G and 4G Network Extender is what I
>>>>>>> was dealing with.  We had to run our own GPS antenna from the roof down 
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> the basement to get the damn thing to sync properly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As an aside, I didn't realize the Low E windows were code now, and
>>>>>>> this is a very newly renovated building.  Will keep that in mind!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- Sam Kirsch, Network Tech Support
>>>>>>> Plexicomm Internet Solutions
>>>>>>> Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>sam...@plexicomm.net | Emergency Support:
>>>>>>> 1.866.759.9713
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: "Jaime Solorza" < <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> To: "Animal Farm" < <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com>
>>>>>>> Date: 02/09/16 10:39 AM
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> cell booster or gps booster?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jaime Solorza
>>>>>>> Wireless Systems Architect
>>>>>>> 915-861-1390
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 8:15 AM, Sam Kirsch <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Pull out a GPS App on your phone and make sure you can actually
>>>>>>>> read the satellites from behind the window (I used 'GPS Test' on 
>>>>>>>> Android).
>>>>>>>> We had to install one of these boosters and were troubleshooting why 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> damn thing wasn't working when I noticed that my phone GPS receiver was
>>>>>>>> working in rooms where the windows were open and not working in rooms 
>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>> the windows were closed. Building management didn't even know they'd
>>>>>>>> purchased the windows with RF film.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *-- Samuel Kirsch, Network SupportPlexicomm - Internet Solutions |
>>>>>>>> <http://www.plexicomm.net/>www.plexicomm.net 
>>>>>>>> <http://www.plexicomm.net/>*
>>>>>>>> *Office: 1.866.759.4678 x109 | Fax: 1.866.852.4688*
>>>>>>>>   *Emergency Support: 1.866.759.9713 | <sam...@plexicomm.net>
>>>>>>>> <sam...@plexicomm.net>sam...@plexicomm.net <sam...@plexicomm.net>*
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------ Original Message ------
>>>>>>>> From: "Adam Moffett" < <dmmoff...@gmail.com>dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> To: <af@afmug.com>af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>> Sent: 2/9/2016 9:50:42 AM
>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Verizon "network extender"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It might not be just a matter of getting the location. If they use
>>>>>>>> the 1pps clock from GPS to calibrate an oscillator before they start
>>>>>>>> transmitting, then it would legitimately take 20-30 minutes.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Telrad BTS's are like that too. Pisses me off if I ever have to
>>>>>>>> reset the power.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2/9/2016 12:12 AM, Jason McKemie wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For whatever reason, the receivers that they use in some of these
>>>>>>>> don't seem to be "modern" at all. They frequently take an excessively 
>>>>>>>> long
>>>>>>>> time to get a lock.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Monday, February 8, 2016, Eric Kuhnke < <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Modern GPS receivers work surprisingly well, if not very
>>>>>>>>> accurately, from inside a single floor wood framed house... My 
>>>>>>>>> oneplus one
>>>>>>>>> will pick up 6 satellites while standing in a central hallway 15'+ 
>>>>>>>>> from any
>>>>>>>>> window. Should be accurate enough to get a location within 75'.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All bets are off if it is a concrete framed apartment building or
>>>>>>>>> something like that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I still find it amazing that anything works at -162 RSL. Thanks to
>>>>>>>>> tiny channel size and very basic modulation.
>>>>>>>>>  On Feb 8, 2016 6:46 PM, "Bill Prince" <
>>>>>>>>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','part15...@gmail.com');> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>  Canopy NAT seems to break it with regularity. It might also
>>>>>>>>>> fail if the GPS location that it reports is not within a 1/4 mile of 
>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>> the customer address is.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also requires enough GPS (like near a window) to get a GPS lock.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/8/2016 3:34 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What are the typical reasons for these not to work?� From the
>>>>>>>>>> user guide it appears to use IPSEC, so I assume anything that 
>>>>>>>>>> prevents a
>>>>>>>>>> VPN?
>>>>>>>>>> �
>>>>>>>>>> Verizon support told the customer they needed a Class A
>>>>>>>>>> address.� WTF?� Did they maybe mean it *can't* be a class A
>>>>>>>>>> address?� Customer uses 10.x.x.x addresses internally, behind 
>>>>>>>>>> Cisco ASA
>>>>>>>>>> firewall (which I don't manage).
>>>>>>>>>> �
>>>>>>>>>> I do see some udp/500 and udp/4500 packets, I think that means
>>>>>>>>>> something is using UDP for IPSEC NAT traversal?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to