you need a house burned down? because what im hearing here is you need a house burned down.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: > True. Part 101 is like Part 15 in that regard. > > -Ty > > > > -Ty > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com> wrote: > >> A part 101 license (other than area-wide licenses or bands that were >> auctioned) does not grant “exclusive use” of a frequency at a location. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof >> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >> >> >> >> When did they go up there? Was it before U-NII-1 was opened up? Maybe >> you can argue that is a separate band, since it wasn’t even available when >> they located there. >> >> >> >> It is common for a lease to specify exclusivity on that tower for certain >> unlicensed bands, or to contain a non-interference clause. Apparently the >> lease doesn’t specify. Probably the city won’t want to get involved, >> that’s why it’s easiest for a site owner to only allow one unlicensed >> tenant, or one per band, they don’t want to play Judge Judy in a technical >> area they know nothing about. >> >> >> >> Maybe show the city a copy of one of your Part 101 licenses showing you >> have exclusive use of that frequency at those locations. Or borrow a 2-way >> license from somebody in the area and show the city a copy. Or find a >> cellular or paging company that is on a city structure, look up and make a >> copy of their FCC license. Tell the city this is the paperwork someone >> will have if the FCC has granted them exclusive use of spectrum, and of >> course the other tenant will not have anything of the kind to show. Maybe >> then turn their WiFi router upside down and show them the Part 15 sticker >> so they can understand this is exactly the same rules you and the other >> tenant are operating under. It would be like saying you can’t use WiFi >> because your next door neighbor had WiFi first. >> >> >> >> That’s not how unlicensed works. That’s not how any of this works. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> >> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 AM >> >> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >> >> >> >> The basic part 15 rule says it all >> >> On Feb 26, 2016 9:13 AM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> We have a co-tennant on a water tower saying that since they were there >> first, they get exclusive use of the entire 5GHz unlicensed band. There >> lease warrants no such thing and we told the the FCC doesn't either. Is >> there a plain english "for dummies" explanation of Part 15, specifically >> regarding interference and co-location? The city is involved and we need to >> make this stupid easy to understand. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Ty >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.