im just sayin, if there was a house, and im not sayin there is, and it burned down, and im not sayin it will, there should probably be, say a gps coordinate, or street address of a house that nobody wants to see burned down. sometimes things happen. I stepped on a nail last night, somebodies house might burn down, a tree might fall in the forest, some things are just outside our control.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > God heard me say, don’t burn his house... > > *From:* Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:05 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies > > I'm not saying I don't need a house burned down. ;) > > -Ty > > > > -Ty > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> you need a house burned down? because what im hearing here is you need a >> house burned down. >> >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com >> > wrote: >> >>> True. Part 101 is like Part 15 in that regard. >>> >>> -Ty >>> >>> >>> >>> -Ty >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> A part 101 license (other than area-wide licenses or bands that were >>>> auctioned) does not grant “exclusive use” of a frequency at a location. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof >>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 AM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> When did they go up there? Was it before U-NII-1 was opened up? Maybe >>>> you can argue that is a separate band, since it wasn’t even available when >>>> they located there. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> It is common for a lease to specify exclusivity on that tower for >>>> certain unlicensed bands, or to contain a non-interference clause. >>>> Apparently the lease doesn’t specify. Probably the city won’t want to get >>>> involved, that’s why it’s easiest for a site owner to only allow one >>>> unlicensed tenant, or one per band, they don’t want to play Judge Judy in a >>>> technical area they know nothing about. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Maybe show the city a copy of one of your Part 101 licenses showing you >>>> have exclusive use of that frequency at those locations. Or borrow a 2-way >>>> license from somebody in the area and show the city a copy. Or find a >>>> cellular or paging company that is on a city structure, look up and make a >>>> copy of their FCC license. Tell the city this is the paperwork someone >>>> will have if the FCC has granted them exclusive use of spectrum, and of >>>> course the other tenant will not have anything of the kind to show. Maybe >>>> then turn their WiFi router upside down and show them the Part 15 sticker >>>> so they can understand this is exactly the same rules you and the other >>>> tenant are operating under. It would be like saying you can’t use WiFi >>>> because your next door neighbor had WiFi first. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That’s not how unlicensed works. That’s not how any of this works. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> *Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 AM >>>> >>>> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The basic part 15 rule says it all >>>> >>>> On Feb 26, 2016 9:13 AM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> We have a co-tennant on a water tower saying that since they were there >>>> first, they get exclusive use of the entire 5GHz unlicensed band. There >>>> lease warrants no such thing and we told the the FCC doesn't either. Is >>>> there a plain english "for dummies" explanation of Part 15, specifically >>>> regarding interference and co-location? The city is involved and we need to >>>> make this stupid easy to understand. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -Ty >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
