im just sayin, if there was a house, and im not sayin there is,
and it burned down, and im not sayin it will, there should
probably be, say a gps coordinate, or street address of a house
that nobody wants to see burned down. sometimes things happen. I
stepped on a nail last night, somebodies house might burn down, a
tree might fall in the forest, some things are just outside our
control.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com
<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
God heard me say, don’t burn his house...
*From:* Ty Featherling <mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 10:05 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies
I'm not saying I don't need a house burned down. ;)
-Ty
-Ty
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
you need a house burned down? because what im hearing
here is you need a house burned down.
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Ty Featherling
<tyfeatherl...@gmail.com
<mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
True. Part 101 is like Part 15 in that regard.
-Ty
-Ty
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Hardy, Tim
<tha...@comsearch.com <mailto:tha...@comsearch.com>>
wrote:
A part 101 license (other than area-wide licenses
or bands that were auctioned) does not grant
“exclusive use” of a frequency at a location.
*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] *On Behalf Of *Ken
Hohhof
*Sent:* Friday, February 26, 2016 11:32 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies
When did they go up there? Was it before U-NII-1
was opened up? Maybe you can argue that is a
separate band, since it wasn’t even available
when they located there.
It is common for a lease to specify exclusivity
on that tower for certain unlicensed bands, or to
contain a non-interference clause. Apparently the
lease doesn’t specify. Probably the city won’t
want to get involved, that’s why it’s easiest for
a site owner to only allow one unlicensed tenant,
or one per band, they don’t want to play Judge
Judy in a technical area they know nothing about.
Maybe show the city a copy of one of your Part
101 licenses showing you have exclusive use of
that frequency at those locations. Or borrow a
2-way license from somebody in the area and show
the city a copy. Or find a cellular or paging
company that is on a city structure, look up and
make a copy of their FCC license. Tell the city
this is the paperwork someone will have if the
FCC has granted them exclusive use of spectrum,
and of course the other tenant will not have
anything of the kind to show. Maybe then turn
their WiFi router upside down and show them the
Part 15 sticker so they can understand this is
exactly the same rules you and the other tenant
are operating under. It would be like saying you
can’t use WiFi because your next door neighbor
had WiFi first.
That’s not how unlicensed works. That’s not how
any of this works.
*From:*Jaime Solorza
<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
*Sent:*Friday, February 26, 2016 10:14 AM
*To:*Animal Farm <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Unlicensed for dummies
The basic part 15 rule says it all
On Feb 26, 2016 9:13 AM, "Ty Featherling"
<tyfeatherl...@gmail.com
<mailto:tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
We have a co-tennant on a water tower saying that
since they were there first, they get exclusive
use of the entire 5GHz unlicensed band. There
lease warrants no such thing and we told the the
FCC doesn't either. Is there a plain english "for
dummies" explanation of Part 15, specifically
regarding interference and co-location? The city
is involved and we need to make this stupid easy
to understand.
-Ty
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your team as part of yourself you have already
failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
