You are probably right. I said "nearly" because I wasn't 100% sure.
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > Nearly everything? What doesn't require a reboot??? I'm pretty sure > every config change requires it. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mimosa is quite good about this too. I don't see why nearly *everything* >> requires a reboot on UBNT. >> >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >>> >Every change gives a reboot. >>> >>> I was spoiled with Mikrotik having every config change done instantly, >>> believe me I know how you feel. >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes. Under very good conditions 1024 QAM is possible with AF5X. With >>>> Back2Back Sync we’ve to play with power levels of the >>>> >>>> remote sides to keep modulations up. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> AF5X is a very good radio. First 5GHz Radio better than PTP600 imho. >>>> And it takes only 10W compared to the 50W of a PTP600. >>>> >>>> The SW is not as good. Every change gives a reboot. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Josh Luthman >>>> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 1. März 2016 15:34 >>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] AF 24 HD Real World Range? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I want to say the old Blackberries could do 64QAM (802.11n)? >>>> >>>> >>>> AF5x can do 1024QAM - that's just AMAZING!!! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> LOL I wouldn't have said "kind of crap", but sure, the AF24 is 64QAM. >>>> >>>> The AF24HD is 256QAM. >>>> >>>> On Mar 1, 2016 8:27 AM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Probably added another modulation on top. Old one was kind of crap, >>>> wasn't it? 64QAM? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Steve Utick <sut...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> However, the HD is also gigabit full duplex as well, whereas the 24 is >>>> only 700 Meg full duplex. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, the price tag on the 'HD' is steeeeeeep. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 9:15 AM, Joe Novak <jno...@lrcomm.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Apologies, I had no idea the AF24HD was going for 6k a link, wow! >>>> Looking back.. it does look like the AF24 is still 3k per link, which I for >>>> some reason thought the AF24HD would be more cost competitive. Mimosa's >>>> links are in a great spot... I think the promise was sometime this month. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:03 PM, Erich Kaiser < >>>> er...@northcentraltower.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Same with Cambium PTP820S >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Erich Kaiser >>>> >>>> North Central Tower >>>> >>>> er...@northcentraltower.com >>>> >>>> Office: 630-621-4804 >>>> >>>> Cell: 630-777-9291 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Chris Wright <ch...@velociter.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> The trick is getting Mimosa to actually ship them. >.> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Chris Wright >>>> >>>> Network Administrator >>>> >>>> Velociter Wireless >>>> >>>> 209-838-1221 x115 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 11:22 AM >>>> *To:* af >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF 24 HD Real World Range? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> A Mimosa B11 link can be done for about the same cost as AF24HD... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> I would do licensed. 11 or 18 GHz. Then you save the spectrum and >>>> have something that works all the time. That that much more money. If you >>>> are maxing out APs then you have the customers to pay for the licensed BH. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> *Sent:* Monday, February 29, 2016 9:25 AM >>>> >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] AF 24 HD Real World Range? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> More than 1.5 to *maybe *2 miles at 24ghz is nuts. >>>> ...but it depends how much rain you get. >>>> >>>> On 2/29/2016 11:23 AM, Sam Lambie wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> I have a PTP 450 link at 6.937 miles that is working fine with 3 access >>>> points. But we want to install another 450 AP and I am loathe to use it as >>>> will saturate the link in no time. >>>> >>>> Looking to save the 5ghz spectrum for our AP's, I am thinking of the >>>> AF24HD. Has anyone installed a link that far? Does it work well? I don't >>>> need the full 2 gigs. More like 300 would be more than enough for quite a >>>> while. >>>> >>>> Sam >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Sam Lambie* >>>> Taosnet Wireless Tech. >>>> 575-758-7598 Office >>>> www.Taosnet.com <http://www.newmex.com> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
