That is what I took from this post: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=63372
We had tons of issues at a site. Nothing made sense, CPU usage was in the teens, but we just saw terrible performance and packet loss at peak. Eventually we found out that we received more complaints on different APs and found the above post. We were only using the tik as a switch at the top of the tower to terminate the fiber up the tower and connect the APs. We replaced with a Netonix and all of our issues at this site went away. I had no idea. A warning label would have saved us months of issues trying to track it down. Joe On Mar 11, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > Well that's news to me! Holy crap. They should put a warning sticker on that. > > On 3/11/2016 2:20 PM, Joe Falaschi wrote: >> The other thing to keep in mind with the RB2011 is what port things are >> plugged into. Ports 6-10 only have a 100M aggregate link to ports 1-5. If >> the aggregate of ports 6-10 require more than 100M, you'll have issues there >> too. >> >
