I don't see anything in that saying the bandwidth from the 10/100 Ethernet
switch chip to the CPU is limited to 100M, maybe I missed something.
It does appear to be true the only connection between the 2 switch chips is
bridging via the CPU.
If using it primarily as a switch not a router, a CRS might be better?
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Falaschi
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 2:51 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Poor throughput on ePMP AP
That is what I took from this post:
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?t=63372
We had tons of issues at a site. Nothing made sense, CPU usage was in the
teens, but we just saw terrible performance and packet loss at peak.
Eventually we found out that we received more complaints on different APs
and found the above post. We were only using the tik as a switch at the top
of the tower to terminate the fiber up the tower and connect the APs. We
replaced with a Netonix and all of our issues at this site went away. I had
no idea. A warning label would have saved us months of issues trying to
track it down.
Joe
On Mar 11, 2016, at 2:23 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
Well that's news to me! Holy crap. They should put a warning sticker on
that.
On 3/11/2016 2:20 PM, Joe Falaschi wrote:
The other thing to keep in mind with the RB2011 is what port things are
plugged into. Ports 6-10 only have a 100M aggregate link to ports 1-5.
If the aggregate of ports 6-10 require more than 100M, you'll have issues
there too.
