No offense meant, I just like kicking around the philosophy ball with folks 
that have opposing points of view.  Only way I learn things.  

From: Josh Reynolds 
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:57 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

I'm pulling back from this discussion. It's a no-win, and there are other hills 
I'd rather die on.

Picking my battles so to speak.

On Mar 13, 2016 11:50 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

  If I have a strong feeling that the guy in the sky that created all of us 
hates the murder of babies, yes I will try to stop that via legislation.  How 
is that persecution?  Just trying to carry out the wishes of the boss.  He has 
promised me a pretty nice apartment if I give it a good try.  

  Persecution?

  From: Josh Reynolds 
  Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 10:46 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

  So you wish to force your religious beliefs on others via legislation, in a 
country created to escape persecution from religion?

  On Mar 13, 2016 11:38 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

    Here is why a churches need to be involved with reproductive care, 
contraception, or abortion.

    If you believe there is a God, Creator, Savior etc.
    >Then if you believe that entity cares about these things (listed above).
    >>Then if you believe that the mind of that entity has communicated its 
wishes with man.
    >>>Then if you believe that those wishes are contained in doctrine of 
churches or bodies of scripture.
    >>>>Then the church and its doctrine trumps all laws of man.  
    The church needs to be involved in all facets of life.  If you believe the 
above.

    You can claim to be agnostic or atheistic but a smart person should hedge 
their bets against actually not knowing that they are totally right about that. 
  Could be that every time you eat spaghetti you are committing a mortal sin.  
Could be.  

    For me and mine, I will take my particular flavor of Christianity and do my 
thing, while you do your thing.  
    But if I have an opportunity to legislate away things I consider mortal 
sins, I will try.  





    From: Josh Reynolds 
    Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 6:54 PM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

    Why does any church need to be involved with reproductive care, 
contraception, or abortion?

    Those are medical issues.

    On Mar 13, 2016 6:48 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> 
wrote:


      Actually, my belief is here in the deep south we have a church on every 
corner.  Let the churches handle it....they are more than capable.

      My tax dollars aren't needed for this. (or many other things)

        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: Ken Hohhof 
        To: af@afmug.com 
        Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 6:18 PM
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

        What many people who lose sleep over Planned Parenthood are actually 
upset about is they offer birth control.  Some people obsess about poor people 
having sex without the punishment of getting pregnant.  See this if you forgot:

        
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rush_Limbaugh%E2%80%93Sandra_Fluke_controversy

        I don’t understand how you can be extremely anti-abortion yet also 
extremely anti-contraception.  Less unwanted pregnancies = less abortions.  
Which is the lesser evil?

        I think it comes down to some people are obsessed with sex, especially 
“other” people having sex.  #nosyneighbors #getalife


        From: Josh Reynolds 
        Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 5:48 PM
        To: af@afmug.com 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan

        Did you research that video? You should. It's not what you think.

        On Mar 13, 2016 5:41 PM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <par...@cyberbroadband.net> 
wrote:


          Yah, i'm kind of like Chuck here.

          I don't care about gay marriage.  I'm not gay, I know a handful of 
gay people.  Not my cup of tea but the government doesn't have any right 
telling them what they can or can't do.

          Same with adoption for a gay couple - shut up gov'mt.   Now, I'm not 
so sure on that.  When I was growing up there were few gay couples who had 
"come out" and we thought if the girl had a different last name than her mommy 
we thought that was odd.  Quite a bit different now but it could still screw 
with a kids head in terms of "traditional marriage".

          It would be hard to NOT state that traditional marriage has gone to 
hell in this country.  But then again, so many "traditional" things have gone 
to hell.  How many women stay at home and take care of the family while dad 
goes to work?

          I am in favor of defunding planned parenthood.  The videos pretty 
much got to me.  It's MY TAX DOLLARS.  Defund it.  There are plenty of other 
non-government-funded entities who can do that work.

          Any tax is bad :)

          I'm going to stop there, i will get in trouble... lol




            ----- Original Message ----- 
            From: Josh Reynolds 
            To: af@afmug.com 
            Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 5:02 PM
            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan


            His stances:
            Gay marriage is wrong
            He doesn't support adoption for a gay couple
            Defund planned parenthood
            Raising corporate tax is bad
            Voted yes for more sentencing and prosecution for juveniles.
            Wants to drill in ANWR
            Voted no on tax credits for renewable energy.
            Voted no on 4 weeks paid parental leave for federal employees.
            Votes for PATRIOT act over and over
            Voted to allow warantless electronic surveillance against us 
citizens
            Denied additional funding that would provide expanded child 
healthcare
            "Let's build a fence!"
            Voted NO on reporting / deporting illegal immigrants who received 
hospital treatment

            Etc. A few things I like him on, but mostly he's a "nope" for me.

            On Mar 13, 2016 4:46 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

              Hey, I said I liked him.  Just not full on man crush.

              I didn’t see how his math added up for the budgets he proposed.  
There were some missing pages where magic happened to balance the budget.  
Seemed like the same old voodoo economics.

              So “man crush”, is that like Trump and Putin?  At least Putin is 
supposedly an 8th degree black belt.  He would probably take care of the 
protester himself.  If Trump thinks he can bully the Putins of the world, I’m 
not so sure.  I think McCain could take him in a fair fight.  Hell, Bernie 
could probably take him.  I was never fond of Nixon, but the photo of the 
“kitchen debate” with Khrushchev is a treasure.
              
http://spectator.org/articles/41740/how-handle-bully-nixon-vs-khrushchev



              From: CBB - Jay Fuller 
              Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 4:19 PM
              To: af@afmug.com 
              Subject: [AFMUG] Paul Ryan


              I have actually followed Paul Ryan since the first time he 
appeared on the national stage.  Very impressed with him.  Could almost call 
him my "man crush".   I'd be interested in hearing what you do not like about 
him Ken.

                ----- Original Message ----- 
                From: Ken Hohhof 
                To: af@afmug.com 
                Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 2:04 PM
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump's Supporters Love Him Even 
More AfterChicago Violence

                I think the "establishment" is missing why people are fed up 
with them, I'm 
                not convinced it's about left or right.  If I had to single out 
one person 
                as the poster boy for why the establishment has failed us, it 
would be Mitch 
                McConnell.  All 4 leaders in Congress have only been worried 
about their own 
                power and re-election, but McConnell is the worst of a bad 
bunch.

                I don't agree with Paul Ryan's economics or some of his 
politics, but I like 
                what he has said since being elected Speaker.  I would like to 
see if they 
                are just words, or if he would translate them into actions.  I 
don't think 
                we will get to find out, election politics seem to have 
rendered him 
                irrelevant.  And Mitch the Turtle would have to be replaced 
with someone 
                actually interested in governing.  I wonder what conservative 
goals could 
                have been accomplished in the 7 years Mitch has spent trying to 
make Obama 
                fail no matter how much damage it causes.  Tort reform?  
Modifications to 
                Obamacare?  Fix sequestration?  Tax reform?  Immigration 
reform?  Mitch 
                doesn't care.  Mitch cares about Mitch.  That's the problem 
with the 
                establishment, they spend all their effort on getting elected 
and staying in 
                power, they don't even pretend to do their job.  And let me be 
clear, I'm 
                not saying Pelosi, Reid and Boehner were much better, it's just 
McConnell is 
                the most blatant hack of the bunch, every time I see him on TV 
I feel he is 
                giving me the finger.

                I am probably fooling myself that Paul Ryan would be different, 
but I don't 
                think we'll find out.


                -----Original Message----- 
                From: Bill Prince
                Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2016 1:40 PM
                To: af@afmug.com
                Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Donald Trump's Supporters Love Him Even 
More After 
                Chicago Violence

                IMO, Obama moved right, and the Republicans moved further to 
the right.

                bp
                <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

                On 3/13/2016 6:01 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
                > Obama moved right as much as the Republicans moved left. 
Everybody's idea 
                > of compromise these days is you come to where I am and I'll 
make a deal.

Reply via email to