You can ask Shane - sh...@kpperformance.ca . He should be able to tell you which brackets are shipping on something.
-Ty On Mar 14, 2016 7:59 PM, "Brandon Yuchasz" <li...@gogebicrange.net> wrote: > That’s what I have done as well in the past. I have been avoiding buying > any more of them because they are such a pain to get into after they are > mounted. The cambium one is actually quite nice an allen wrench and that’s > all it takes to swap but they are not available in as many different > coverages. > > > > Best regards, > > Brandon Yuchasz > > GogebicRange.net > > www.gogebicrange.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy > *Sent:* Monday, March 14, 2016 6:26 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors > > > > Someone else will have to comment on that. I found the best solution was > to remove the two side bolts and leave the bracket mounted to the pole. > Then loosen the two on top and swivel the sector up to remove the cover. > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Brandon Yuchasz <li...@gogebicrange.net> > wrote: > > Without taking this one to far off track. Did they upgrade all the > antennas brackets or if we buy one of the epmp5hz are we going to still not > be able to open the cases when mounted on a tower? > > > > Best regards, > > Brandon Yuchasz > > GogebicRange.net > > www.gogebicrange.net > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jeremy > *Sent:* Monday, March 14, 2016 5:24 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] KP 3.65/5 Ghz Sectors > > > > Glad to hear they scrapped that. I wanted some sort of a seal, but one > that would slide in and out would be preferable. Nobody wants to encounter > a nest the size of one of those boxes at the top of a tower. > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I complained about the addition of the cable glands because of the way it > was implemented. The glands are part of the removable part of the box, not > the stationary part. As a result to remove that cover on the box you had to > loosen the cable glands, push enough slack through to allot you to swivel > out the cover, and then let the cover hang with the cables going through > it. Hated it. I talked to Shane about it and he said an engineer threw that > feature in at the last minute and they have since removed them from the > design. I said just redesign so that the cable glands are stationary at the > bottom of the box and let the lid close around them. We'll see. > > > > I am using the dual-5Ghzsectors and have had great results with them. I am > swapping out 120 that are full with these dual 60s using the same mounts > and getting more capacity. > > > > -Ty > > > > > > > -Ty > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you have used KP antennas before they have made some marked > improvements over their old hardware designs. The bracket is stronger, but > also sticks out much further, removing the need to disconnect the sector to > get the rear cover off. If you are not using UBNT or EPMP, then the cover > never needs to come off (except to connect the Type-N jumpers initially), > and the 450 sectors can be mounted to the cover. Having not done that, I > am guessing it will be a fairly tight fit. The grooves are the correct > size this time, and Rockets fit without modifications (after a slip up in > manufacturing and testing that we received on our last order). The EPMP > adapter also appears to work, although I haven't tried it personally. > > > > Also, the shielded boxes used to fill up with Wasps, but now they have > cable glands leading into the AP case. My only complaint with this new > improvement was that the shielded connectors do not fit through the gland. > It's a lesson that I should have learned long ago, but I didn't....so I had > to cut the ends off, push them through, and then re-terminate them. > > > > We are only using the 2.4GHz/5GHz combos, and have been happy with their > performance. They are a huge antenna, but not as big as two antennas. > > > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications > Inc <t...@franklinisp.net> wrote: > > Good afternoon, > > > > If you have deployed the KP Performance 3.65/5Ghz Dual Sectors, I am > curious how they are working for you. > > Also, if you are, did you have to modify any part of the equipment for > proper mounting/installations? > > > > To save tower space, I am considering deploying several but don’t won’t to > have performance problems. > > > > *Tyson Burris, President* > *Internet Communications Inc.* > *739 Commerce Dr.* > *Franklin, IN 46131* > > *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #* > *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #* > *Online: **www.surfici.net* <http://www.surfici.net> > > > > [image: ICI] > > *What can ICI do for you?* > > > *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP > Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.* > > *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the* > *addressee shown. It contains information that is* > *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,* > *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by* > *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly* > *prohibited.* > > > > > > > > > > >
