Yup, I believe the B11 is ac based. The AF will do true FDD so you can
license standard coordinated channel pairs. And to top it off, they went
the Exalt path with field replaceable diplexers. And looks like you can
reverse the diplexer for high or low side.
The N connector thing is kinda odd. As Chuck said, they would've been
better off with SMA @ 11GHz. Or even better, a f'n waveguide interface!
C'mon UBNT!
On 3/17/2016 10:40 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I'm pretty sure Mimosa actually is 802.11 based, but yeah the airFiber
certainly is not.
Also, do NOT compare airFiber quality with anything else UBNT makes...
it's on a completely different level than the airMax stuff.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com
<mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote:
Mimosa isn't 802.11 based as far as I know. UBNT is doing this on
AirFiber FPGA. Who's making 802.11 based 11G radios?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:32 AM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com
<mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote:
> is anyone else concerned about the quality and reliability that
comes with
> these low cost 802.11 based 11ghz radios??
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com
<mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote:
>>
>> When we bought our SAF stuff a few years back, we had to show our
>> distributor our coordination docs before they would ship gear.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lewis Bergman
<lewis.berg...@gmail.com <mailto:lewis.berg...@gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > I don't know about turning sellers into enforcement arms of
the FCC. All
>> > of
>> > that is really the FCC's job. Has there really been a problem?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 10:17 AM Cassidy B. Larson
<c...@infowest.com <mailto:c...@infowest.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> That would be an awesome idea to limit random joes from
lighting up
>> >> un-registered/coordinated links. But shouldnt they do that
for 3.65 as
>> >> well?
>> >>
>> >> > On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Brian Sullivan
>> >> > <installe...@foxvalley.net <mailto:installe...@foxvalley.net>>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > Can't they force some sort of compliance with license keys
you get
>> >> > after
>> >> > you prove your FCC application/coordination?
>> >>
>> >
>
>
