+1 on SAF. After dealing Trango's licensed crap/garbage for years, it's
been hard to move away from SAF.

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:05 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have two SAF 11ghz links up
>
> What I dont like about them is that I never have any reason to look at
> them, so I dont know if they are doing stuff they shouldnt, like smoking
> crack or general mischief. I feel like a bad parent who doesnt check on my
> kids.
>
> I like UBNT, because there is always something, so I am always checking on
> them, I know theyre not going to go shoot up a school.
>
> So Im torn
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I do have to say though, we'll probably be buying a ton of these
>> things... the problem of idiots buying them aside, they really do sound
>> pretty awesome.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> haha
>>>
>>> Yeah, unless they don't allow most of their resellers sell these things,
>>> that isn't going to be happening.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:48 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> VAR+UBNT+DECENCY
>>>>
>>>> Im glad I want taking a drink when i read that
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully the VAR's have the decency to ask the question: "By the way,
>>>>> do you have the FCC license for this?"
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 3/17/2016 10:45 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a good point... hopefully, the price is still high enough to
>>>>> keep a good percentage of the idiots away, but between these and the B11, 
>>>>> I
>>>>> suspect there will be a lot more unlicensed 11ghz links going up than 
>>>>> there
>>>>> ever were before, unfortunately.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fortunately for us, the majority of the idiots around here would never
>>>>> spend $1600 on a link when they could get a pair of AC 5ghz radios for a
>>>>> couple hundred... since they wouldn't understand the difference anyway. I
>>>>> can definitely see it being a big problem in a lot of areas though.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/17/16 7:20 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> at least they can alter the licensing fees. There goes the
>>>>>>> neighborhood
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get a license? Surely you jest. Every unlicensed and unregistered
>>>>>> 3.65 I've come across is a UBNT user. Not that the NN license meant much,
>>>>>> but still. Costs mostly kept the average idiots at bay in part 101.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to