I'm running 3.1 mostly without issue. My only problem is when connecting to
routers that are on 5.x. There are menu items missing, stuff like the routing
tab aren't there. But when connecting to 6.x routers it has been working
perfectly for me.
BTW: I'm running it under Wine on a Debian box.
--
Christopher Tyler
MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
Total Highspeed Internet Services
417.851.1107
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 4:26:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Winbox 3.3
I have to admit, we were trying to trade address lists between the "mac
winbox", which actually may be a basterdized version that is in some
limbo-land between 3.x and 2.x. As long as your winbox is actually
running on windows, then the issues are more muted.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 3/20/2016 2:10 PM, George Skorup wrote:
> Hm. Well, I just exported my 2.x address list and it imported into 3.3
> no problem. Then I did the groups. So far looks like it's working with
> no random crap.... yet. I renamed my 2.2.18 exe and will keep it
> around for a while.
>
> On 3/20/2016 3:16 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
>> I've tried it a few times with mixed results. I know that the router
>> access list is not interchangeable between 3.x and 2.x. I'm still
>> using 2.2.18 because of the various glitches. Kind of stupid that
>> there's no easy D/L of any of the 2.x versions.
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 3/20/2016 1:01 PM, George Skorup wrote:
>>> Anyone using it yet? Any issues? The last time I tried any Winbox
>>> 3.x (3.2 I think), it was really stupid. Had a bunch of routers that
>>> then no longer stored preference info when connecting with Winbox 2.
>>> Then I think the next 3.x beta did something that fixed it, and I
>>> gave up on 3.x.
>>
>
