I use 3.0 on my management desktop, no problems
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Christopher Tyler <
ch...@totalhighspeed.net> wrote:
> I'm running 3.1 mostly without issue. My only problem is when connecting
> to routers that are on 5.x. There are menu items missing, stuff like the
> routing tab aren't there. But when connecting to 6.x routers it has been
> working perfectly for me.
>
> BTW: I'm running it under Wine on a Debian box.
>
> --
> Christopher Tyler
> MTCRE/MTCNA/MTCTCE/MTCWE
> Total Highspeed Internet Services
> 417.851.1107
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 4:26:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Winbox 3.3
>
> I have to admit, we were trying to trade address lists between the "mac
> winbox", which actually may be a basterdized version that is in some
> limbo-land between 3.x and 2.x. As long as your winbox is actually
> running on windows, then the issues are more muted.
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
> On 3/20/2016 2:10 PM, George Skorup wrote:
> > Hm. Well, I just exported my 2.x address list and it imported into 3.3
> > no problem. Then I did the groups. So far looks like it's working with
> > no random crap.... yet. I renamed my 2.2.18 exe and will keep it
> > around for a while.
> >
> > On 3/20/2016 3:16 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
> >> I've tried it a few times with mixed results. I know that the router
> >> access list is not interchangeable between 3.x and 2.x. I'm still
> >> using 2.2.18 because of the various glitches. Kind of stupid that
> >> there's no easy D/L of any of the 2.x versions.
> >>
> >> bp
> >> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
> >>
> >> On 3/20/2016 1:01 PM, George Skorup wrote:
> >>> Anyone using it yet? Any issues? The last time I tried any Winbox
> >>> 3.x (3.2 I think), it was really stupid. Had a bunch of routers that
> >>> then no longer stored preference info when connecting with Winbox 2.
> >>> Then I think the next 3.x beta did something that fixed it, and I
> >>> gave up on 3.x.
> >>
> >
>
>
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
