no real way to do that remotely is there with no one holding the reset and a layer 2 connection?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > No. TFTP flash recreates the flash filesystem. HTTP upgrade does not. > On Apr 10, 2016 9:38 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < > thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> if it happens to be crumped, and i http it a firmware, it should still >> overwrite the funtime hatred shouldnt it? >> >> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Nope. Just TFTP flash it to the newest stable firmware. >>> On Apr 10, 2016 9:02 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Is there somethin ng to run against this air router to check it? >>>> On Apr 10, 2016 7:53 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://m.theregister.co.uk/2014/07/29/antivirus_blood_splattered_as_biz_warned_audit_or_die/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://arstechnica.com/security/2015/09/security-wares-like-kaspersky-av-can-make-you-more-vulnerable-to-attacks/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://books.google.com/books?id=wqV1CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA183&lpg=PA183&dq=antivirus+attack+surface&source=bl&ots=HF7hnyj7sN&sig=Ski6OAQaLdD4MeIDGJRfuNoaZiE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjsgP7nroXMAhUjk4MKHb19DQ0Q6AEIKzAE#v=onepage&q=antivirus%20attack%20surface&f=false >>>>> On Apr 10, 2016 6:21 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Josh, >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you expand that? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The following is the last communication, note this started as a >>>>>> slowness complaint. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi. I had a couple questions regarding the wireless router that you >>>>>> provide with my service. Since I don't have access to the device, could >>>>>> you >>>>>> turn off broadcasting of the SSID please? The reason for this request due >>>>>> to a very damaging virus/malware that hit my home network extremely >>>>>> hard.gained access to my networks through the wireless connection and my >>>>>> phone, which then took out every thing else connected. The Wi-Fi that >>>>>> caused the issue ended up as "OPEN" and not longer secure. Since there is >>>>>> such massive distances between any of us our her I would only see that >>>>>> specific SSID on days when everthing allowed to to travel just a litter >>>>>> bit >>>>>> further. And when I did see it over the last 1.5 years, but it was always >>>>>> "Secured". Anyway... the story is much longer but A. can you hide the >>>>>> SSID >>>>>> and possibly change it to something else? This way I know it has a little >>>>>> extra protection. But please let me know the the SSID. Do you by chance >>>>>> know of an SSID near me of: ISPSTUFF360? It's Mac address is >>>>>> 00:60:ld:f1:91:be. It came back as a Lucent Technologies device. Also.. I >>>>>> was not simply taken out of service by 1 "Open" device...I was taken out >>>>>> by >>>>>> 2 ! The second one that is also broadcasting as "Open is similar in >>>>>> name. . >>>>>> It\s SSID is ISPSTUFF1000. I have it's mac address somewhere in the >>>>>> middle >>>>>> of all this mess, but its the same I believe. It also resolved by MAC >>>>>> address to a Lucent Technologies Devic. From what discovered from once I >>>>>> had a change to finish up replacing the hard drive in my laptop, ending >>>>>> up >>>>>> with corruption in the bios as well, replacing a drive in my Workstations >>>>>> as it would not ever respond to restoration software. And so much figging >>>>>> time to install everything. I had to be safe and reset my phone, my >>>>>> tablet >>>>>> pc and and my FLAC file of over 119gb of my entire music collection. Not >>>>>> to. I still dont feel comfortable given how destructive it was. I >>>>>> immediately had to spend our upon hour callng banks, and Website, and >>>>>> anyting that I accessed online to change my logins and passwords.. It >>>>>> even >>>>>> appears to have left it's mark on the Direct TV DVR as well. So I have >>>>>> already spent more $ than I had to spare but I most definately dont trust >>>>>> any of the devices anylonger. Especially since the 2 devices are still >>>>>> broadcasting as I send this. Kevin >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> FYI antimalware/antivirus and adblock are the newest attack vectors. >>>>>>> :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pretty easy way to get persistent malware on machines now. >>>>>>> On Apr 10, 2016 3:57 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Im a worst case scenario artist. My concern is the customer will >>>>>>>> talk to our customer service, theyll tell him we will replace his >>>>>>>> router. >>>>>>>> He will bring it in, get a replacement. Its been "infected" and will >>>>>>>> hit >>>>>>>> our Achilles heel. Customer service will drop it in the returns bin. It >>>>>>>> will get taken abk and connected to the machine thats used to dump the >>>>>>>> file, it will "infect" that machine, that machine will infect the >>>>>>>> Customer >>>>>>>> service network. A tech will pick up the router and install it at >>>>>>>> another >>>>>>>> POP. infecting that POP. he will also bring his laptop back and >>>>>>>> connect it >>>>>>>> to my network. My machine has no real antimalware and he will infect it >>>>>>>> across that network. My machine has all the keys to the castle. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> the reality is they guy probably had slow wifi in his detached >>>>>>>> garage 1500 feet from his house, and his buddy mike said he must be >>>>>>>> infected with some really nasty virus because his portable version of >>>>>>>> AVG >>>>>>>> from 2010 cant find it so it must be direct from anonymous. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Josh Reynolds < >>>>>>>> j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cross platform malware is a Thing now, and has been for several >>>>>>>>> years. It's fortunately not very prevalent yet. >>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 2016 3:36 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I don't believe it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> We have a friend that comes to some outrageous conclusions with >>>>>>>>>> scant information, and practically zero technical knowledge. Yet >>>>>>>>>> when he >>>>>>>>>> explains something, he sounds perfectly reasonable with impeccable >>>>>>>>>> logic. >>>>>>>>>> It just never is. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> bp >>>>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 4/10/2016 1:29 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So we have this customer who experienced a ferocious malware, >>>>>>>>>> still waiting on more details from the customer, its very interesting >>>>>>>>>> because it crossed multiple platforms. multiple cell phones, a >>>>>>>>>> satellite >>>>>>>>>> DVR, a PC etc. Im not sure how he verified infection, but he did >>>>>>>>>> have to >>>>>>>>>> factory his phones, his PC he said required a hard drive replacement >>>>>>>>>> (not >>>>>>>>>> sure what or who decided this) not sure how the satellite DVR was >>>>>>>>>> mitigated. He thinks it came from a Rise Broadband (formerly Prairie >>>>>>>>>> Inet >>>>>>>>>> ESSID (I doubt this, the ESSIDs prairie inet ran were open, with >>>>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>>>> security for the access) >>>>>>>>>> With it being as cross platform as it was im wondering how i >>>>>>>>>> would check the air router we provide to see if it got hit as well. >>>>>>>>>> All we >>>>>>>>>> do is a dump file on the current firmware that sets a password, >>>>>>>>>> ensures 443 >>>>>>>>>> is open, sets a DMZ to an IP out of the DHCP scope, and we manually >>>>>>>>>> set the >>>>>>>>>> ESSID with WPA2, the key being the MAC on the label ( it think this >>>>>>>>>> is the >>>>>>>>>> WLAN) (we disable snmp, telnet, but leave ssh open), we also turn >>>>>>>>>> off CDP >>>>>>>>>> and the ubnt discovery >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Im hoping he has some good info on what this actually was, and >>>>>>>>>> its not just a case of his buddy jim telling him all this. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Anybody know of something in the wild capable of hitting all >>>>>>>>>> these devices across a network (wired/wireless) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Im asking about the airrrouter in particular, considering if it >>>>>>>>>> were impacted, that could be a mess at the POP since most customer >>>>>>>>>> NAT are >>>>>>>>>> in the same subnet, with duplicate configs >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see >>>>>>>>>> your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the >>>>>>>>>> team. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.