Approximate price? Looks like the specs are intended mostly for European sales. 1000 MHz wide channel is usable in the USA and would survive rain a lot better (you can go down to QPSK with certain code rates and still do 1Gbps FDD).
Though it's good to see it's still >1Gbps at 500 MHz 16QAM. On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Daniel Gerlach <danielgerl...@gmail.com> wrote: > @stefan > > check the Ultralink-FX80..It achieves throughputs of up to 3 Gbit/s, while > offering a complete set of networking and packet synchronization features > necessary for 4G RAN backhaul! > * 60 cm / 51 dBi (Compliant with ETSI EN 302 217 Class 3) > > and the Price is cheaper than Siklu and Bridgewave! > > Daniel > > 2016-04-14 3:33 GMT+02:00 Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>: > >> Next time >> On Apr 13, 2016 7:15 PM, "Peter Kranz" <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote: >> >>> I hate the spring loaded version with a passion.. Try the commscope ones >>> and I bet you will be a convert too. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 5:02 PM >>> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Siklu >>> >>> >>> >>> Oops...not those.. I was a stop light and hadn't zoomed in.....the >>> spring loaded version >>> >>> On Apr 13, 2016 5:54 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Those are them.... >>> >>> On Apr 13, 2016 5:29 PM, "Peter Kranz" <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote: >>> >>> If you haven’t tried the commscope mounts with the Siklus you should >>> also try them.. 100x times better than the standard siklu mount. >>> >>> >>> >>> [image: >>> https://scontent.cdninstagram.com/hphotos-xfp1/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/11267180_160691087618539_1166461485_n.jpg] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Jaime Solorza >>> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 13, 2016 10:47 AM >>> *To:* Animal Farm <af@afmug.com> >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Siklu >>> >>> >>> >>> I prefer Siklu over Bridgewave for one important reason... mounting and >>> alignment brackets...better thought process into aligning at such critical >>> frequencies.... >>> >>> On Apr 13, 2016 11:09 AM, "Peter Kranz" <pkr...@unwiredltd.com> wrote: >>> >>> This is no longer true.. Check out the EtherHaul-2500’s .. I offers the >>> same output power as the Bridgewave units. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Peter Kranz*www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>> pkr...@unwiredltd.com >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Eric Kuhnke >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 12, 2016 2:43 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Siklu >>> >>> >>> >>> Max transmit power on the Siklus is +7 or +10 (which you can put into a >>> 51.5 dBi gain 60cm antenna), so you will never go as far at five nines >>> reliability as a more expensive, high powered 80 GHz link (Bridgewave, >>> E-Band) which has +18 or +19 Tx power. >>> >>> It depends on how far you're trying to go and your rain zone/rain rate >>> in mm/hour. >>> >>> Of course there is serious rain fade, it's 80 GHz. You just have to >>> engineer the link right. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Experience with 80GHz on short links (Looking for a 1mile link)? >>> >>> Rain Fade? >>> >>> Stability of Hardware? >>> >>> >>> >>> There is no planning tool on their website, no manual, no firmware >>> download site. >>> >>> Looks like you’ve to pay even for SW-Fixes? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >
