Awesome!

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here is a good place to start:
> https://hamstudy.org/tech2014
>
> *From:* Jeremy <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2016 8:50 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Micropop at a HAM
>
> Yeah, I am clueless about HAM radio.  We provide an Ethernet connection to
> them for their VoIP gateway in trade for power.  We are also letting them
> put an omni on top of our tower.  I really only want to pass the HAM test
> so that I can get license plates with a picture of a tower on them....
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Funny, as a former ham, 402 MHz is Ultra High Frequencies...
>>
>> *From:* Jeremy <[email protected]>
>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2016 8:37 AM
>> *To:* [email protected]
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Micropop at a HAM
>>
>> We are in the process of building a major pop on a site with two HAM
>> organizations together on it.  Everything they have is low frequencies
>> (like 420MHz or something).  I don't anticipate any problems.  They wanted
>> to share a rack, but I 86'ed that idea.  My wiring is too meticulous to
>> share a rack with anyone.  I told them I'd rather be in a box on a pole
>> outside than share a rack in the building.  I ended up mounting a box with
>> a lock inside the building.
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Daniel White <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> One of the absolute best sites (something like 500 subs) that the WISP I
>>> worked for had was a HAM radio operators property.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But just like anything, it all depends on the personality of the person
>>> and what frequencies they are using.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’d certainly look into it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel White
>>>
>>> Managing Director – Hardware Distribution Sales
>>>
>>> ConVergence Technologies
>>>
>>> Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy
>>> /sarcasm
>>> *Sent:* Saturday, April 16, 2016 12:52 AM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Micropop at a HAM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We have this little cluster we have not been able to penetrate well even
>>> with 900mhz, its got maybe 12-15 houses, weve only been able to get three
>>> out of maybe 7 we have been called to service. There is also a business
>>> there that would get our top non DIA rate, but nobody there would want to
>>> invest in anything like a tall enough tower to clear the trees. One of the
>>> guys that we were able to get to was only viable with 900 mhz fsk, and he
>>> pounds it constantly, primarily upload, so hes low priority on that ap
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We do have one long time customer, but hes a HAM, hes been kind of
>>> troublesome to the rest of the staff, but always really good with me. (he
>>> found out the 320 power supply on his service emits a particular frequency
>>> that interfered with one of his projects, I said maybe a farady cage with
>>> chokes on all the cables, he did it and it worked)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> His property is LOS to our pop and positioned where we could pick up the
>>> three existing and two of the NLOS people without a tower, with something
>>> short like 40 foot we could pick up the rest and get them all on higher
>>> capacity rates (and get the guy off the 900 AP)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the concern is whether a hammie is likely to get uppity about the rf
>>> mess we will make, thats a headache that wouldnt be worth it for a handful
>>> of customers.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> anybody ever done a micropop on these guys properties, I know it varies
>>> by individual, but is it worth it dealing with them? And with HAMs having
>>> priority on some of our spectrum, can we prioritize our service needs via
>>> contract and it be enforceable (not that its worth staying on a location
>>> where you go to court)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2109?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2109-v2-a>
>>>  Virus-free.
>>> www.avast.com
>>> <https://www.avast.com/en-us/lp-safe-emailing-2109?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=oa-2109-v2-a>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to