Um, so if you don't seewhy this isn't allowed, I don't know what to say.
And to quit a processor over running an unnatural charge that wasn't a
normal part of your charge history is crazy.  I bet they tried to help you
and thats why the runnaround only to be told by their bank that its a
no-no.  Its also in most merchant agreements.



On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Jason McKemie <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I would have done the same thing.
>
> On Saturday, April 16, 2016, Jeremy <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, but this is a ridiculous reason to leave IPPay.  Also, it is a
>> grey area when it comes to legality.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:55 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> ther may be ftc regulations that would create a criminal liability for
>>> processors allowing kiting
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Tyson @ Internet Communications Inc
>>> (ICI) <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> My 2 cents:
>>>>
>>>> Who cares! The merchant gets their damn money.  Unless you have some
>>>> kind of charge back history, it's stupid.   The only thing I will say, as
>>>> an outsider, if you did it for the rewards perk...why?
>>>>
>>>> Doesn't the reward get off set by the merchant fees?  It's a wash.
>>>>
>>>> If the intent was for something else, it's really none of their
>>>> business.  They make money.
>>>>
>>>> Disclaimer:  I don't use them
>>>>
>>>> *Tyson Burris, President*
>>>>  *Internet Communications Inc.*
>>>>  *739 Commerce Dr.*
>>>>  *Franklin, IN 46131*
>>>>
>>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #*
>>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #*
>>>> *Online: **www.surfici.net*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Forgive the brevity, the typos and my fat fingers!
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 15, 2016, at 4:43 PM, Scott Vander Dussen <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I’ve received a few off-list request for my story and a couple here
>>>> on-list.  I don’t mind sharing, I just didn’t want to come out with a rant
>>>> about IPPay because that wasn’t my goal.  I share this experience because I
>>>> really value this list and the contributions made by all you wonderful
>>>> people.  Few things have shaped my business and been as valuable of a
>>>> resource as this list (beginning as Part-15.org <http://part-15.org>
>>>> to current), so thank you everyone!  (:  Part of that awesomeness is
>>>> sometimes sharing the less than stellar experiences we face, here’s mine
>>>> with IP Pay.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. I wanted to make a purchase that was not eligible for a CC payment
>>>> and get the cash back rewards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. I contacted Cap1 and asked if I could use one of those blank
>>>> “courtesy checks” they send out to write to myself and basically get a cash
>>>> advance plus then get the cash back rewards. They said no problem, but the
>>>> checks are exempt from cash back rewards.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3. I asked if I as a business could run my own card into my own bank
>>>> account for the cash rewards.  She said no problem, I asked her to research
>>>> the Cap 1 Visa ToS to verify, she did and again no problem.  I then asked
>>>> her to triple verify by confirming with her supervisor, and again no
>>>> problem.  They said if you have that resource to process your own card and
>>>> you’re paying your minimum balances etc. it’s a non-issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 4. I researched “Credit Card Kiting” which is the process of paying a
>>>> credit card balance with another credit card- the practice is only a
>>>> problem when there is deception involved.  Even the Wikipedia article
>>>> demonstrates its OK when there is not deception.  And this isn’t even
>>>> kiting, it’s just processing a credit card for cash in the bank.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 5. We process a card for $20k
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 6. Tanya Krapil from IPPay halts the transaction,  holds the funds and
>>>> emails me asking if it’s legit.  (lost a whole day of expected funds
>>>> because of this)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 7. I reply it’s legit.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 8. Tayan demands invoices and “documentation” before she will release
>>>> the funds.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 9. I reply: “We don't share our invoices with parties not involved with
>>>> the transaction, that is not only a breach of confidentiality but
>>>> inappropriate for you to ask. While I can appreciate your concern for fraud
>>>> I have, as the CEO of Velociter, already confirmed the legitimacy of this
>>>> transaction. If at this time you are cause further delays in processing
>>>> this transaction then I will consider your actions as unreasonable
>>>> non-performance and a termination of our long standing business
>>>> relationship.”
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 10. Tayna the replies that she will process this transaction.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 11. Subsequently Tayna spoke telephonically with other staff and
>>>> determined the card was employee owned.  Tayna said she’d process the
>>>> payment but it isn’t a kosher practice.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 12. Tayna then emails me to tell me just kidding, she’s not going to
>>>> process the payment after all. (losing yet another day of expected funds)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> My grief is that on a $20k tag Tayna doesn’t bother to pick up the
>>>> phone and call, just arbitrarily held the funds and sent an email.  Then
>>>> she said two times that she would indeed process the payment only to then
>>>> change her mind later.  It’s horrible customer service to say one thing and
>>>> then not honor it, even if you made a mistake.  I’m particularly bothered
>>>> by her asking for “invoices and documentation” to support the charge; the
>>>> US in particular is getting so used to sacrificing our privacy and
>>>> freedoms.  Tayna is demanding I send over information that completely out
>>>> of her sphere of concern.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tayna is citing that it’s a Visa policy not process your own card, but
>>>> has provided no documentation to support that.  There is no deception
>>>> involved, we called and pre-authorized the transaction with Cap1 on a
>>>> recorded call and Cap1 gave their blessing.  I contract with IPPay to
>>>> process the CC cards I enter, nothing more.  Even if there is some obscure
>>>> Visa ToS that prohibits this transaction for this specific reason (this is 
>>>> *
>>>> *not** credit card kiting) Tayna’s lack of professionalism and the
>>>> subsequent headache it’s caused me finished my company’s business
>>>> relationship with IPPay.  And I would greatly question who is the
>>>> enforcement of Visa’s ToS, the merchant or the issuing bank.  I’d lean
>>>> heavily towards the issuing bank.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyhow, thanks for the feedback and suggestions of other merchants.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mike Hammett
>>>> *Sent:* Friday, April 15, 2016 11:35
>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Merchant services
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Same.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----
>>>> Mike Hammett
>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> *From: *"Jason Wilson" <[email protected]>
>>>> *To: *[email protected]
>>>> *Sent: *Friday, April 15, 2016 1:22:03 PM
>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Merchant services
>>>>
>>>> Scott, I am an IPPay client,  email privately your decision to move.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jason
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jason Wilson
>>>>
>>>> Remotely Located
>>>>
>>>> Providing High Speed Internet to out of the way places.
>>>>
>>>> 530-651-1736
>>>>
>>>> 530-748-9608 Cell
>>>>
>>>> www.remotelylocated.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Authorize.net <http://authorize.net>?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Scott Vander Dussen
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > Without all the nasty details, I'm completely done doing business
>>>> with IPPay. Any recommendations for alternatives?
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > 'S
>>>> >
>>>> > Sent mobile!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
Regards,
Chuck

Reply via email to