I ran into this with an AT&T customer once, I finally dicked around in their router and got it to bridge, I had to do something with the dhcp server, I don't completely recall, but the AT&T tech was a douche so I hung up on him and figured it out. I wish I could remember what I had to do. I remember though that the interface terms didn't make sense on their face but once I did whatever it was that I did, it worked, but they may have had a /29 applied to the router On May 1, 2016 10:18 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
Yes that'd be double NAT. Who cares about IPv6... Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 1, 2016 11:16 PM, "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > It seems like the "Official" Solution is to put a 2nd router behind it, > then put that router on a DMZ Address. Wouldn't that mean Double NAT > Then? And probably loose all the IPv6 then. > > On 5/1/2016 10:14 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: > > Can you just set it to bridge? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > On May 1, 2016 11:13 PM, "Nate Burke" <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote: > >> I'm doing work at an office that is fed with AT&T DSL. The AT&T router >> is a piece of Garbage. I can't disable the internal DHCP Server, or do any >> IPV4 port forwarding (however, it is handing out IPv6 addresses) On the >> inside of the network, I already have unifi and Managed switches, so I just >> need a hardwired DSL router with no Wifi. Any recommendations for one? >> I'd love to use a Mikrotik, but I don't think they ever came out with a >> Routerboard with a DSL Port did they? >> > >
