Hi Andreas, 

in our network, we handle this as follows:- 

1) we make sure that the PBX is marking the packets with the DSCP tags 
correctly. 
2) we make sure that the phone/iad are marking the packets with DSCP tags 
correctly. 
3) we make sure that the Radios (AP & CPE) are using firmware that respects the 
DSCP Tags, and provides them with appropriate priority 
4) we don't do anything on our routers (in our network). if we have to, the 
only thing we do on the customer router (Dmarc) is to make sure that the dscp 
tags are correct. 

And this works very well for us. 

Regards. 

Faisal Imtiaz 
Snappy Internet & Telecom 
7266 SW 48 Street 
Miami, FL 33155 
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net 

> From: "Andreas Wiatowski" <andr...@silowireless.com>
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 1:39:36 AM
> Subject: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Routers and VOIP QOS

> Hello All!

> We have about 90 sites primarily with CCR’s of various flavours. We have yet 
> to
> implement any type of QOS for our VOIP..but we are starting to feel some
> quality pain with a couple of our “ON NET” PBX/SIP products.

> I have been reading about using mangle rules to mark connections and then
> packets, then setting up a QUEUE tree in MT where the packet marks are
> prioritized. We are fully routed with no layer 2 / bridging. I’m wondering if 
> I
> can accomplish the same thing by just identifying the IP of my Multi-Tenant 
> PBX
> box and any traffic moving to and from…and prioritizing it as 1. Secondly, do 
> I
> have to do this on every single router on my network?

> OR Is it a better practice to IDENTIFY DCSP or TOS, mark and prioritize that
> instead. Just looking for the best way to unify this across my network.

> Anyone have examples? Many of the examples I have seen really relate to SOHO
> type situations…. We are talking much larger here. Most of my transport is
> 200Mbps to 10Gbps between sites.

> Cheers,

> Andreas Wiatowski, CEO
> Silo Wireless Inc.
> 519-449-5656 x-600

Reply via email to