I'll plug in directly tomorrow and see.

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 18, 2016, at 17:09, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
> 
>  
> Judging from the last 5 posts, no one has yet...
> if his test server is inhouse as i think he said - i agree, should be an 
> interesting response
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nate Burke
> To: af@afmug.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 5:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility
> 
> So then do you get full line speed results from the test?
> 
>> On 5/18/2016 5:51 PM, Cassidy B. Larson wrote:
>> Interesting though, from watching tcpdump while doing a speedtest, I’m 
>> seeing it hit BOTH of our local on-net Netflix appliances (over IPv6).
>> 
>> 
>>> On May 18, 2016, at 4:49 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4 and 205.251.244.235 are both Amazon IPs. 
>>> Netflix uses a lot of EC2 stuff, so you’re not necessarily hitting their 
>>> “cache” when you pull up their website. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On May 18, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Very inaccurate too.
>>>> I get 160Mbps results on a 10Gbps connection.
>>>> This is with a path to Netflix that pretty much sits in LA.
>>>> So I am assuming I hit their CDN in LA all the time.
>>>> Not sure where their speed test web app is located.
>>>> IPv6
>>>> C:\Users\Sterling>tracert netflix.com
>>>> Tracing route to netflix.com [2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4]
>>>> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>>>>   1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  2606:cb80:2:2::1
>>>>   2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  2604:ba00:1:22::1
>>>>   3    18 ms    22 ms    22 ms  he.net.slix.net [2607:fa18:1:f00::15]
>>>>   4    18 ms    18 ms    19 ms  10ge1-1.core1.las1.he.net 
>>>> [2001:470:0:27d::1]
>>>>   5    23 ms    23 ms    24 ms  10ge1-14.core1.lax2.he.net 
>>>> [2001:470:0:27e::1]
>>>>   6    18 ms    21 ms    24 ms  100ge2-1.core1.lax1.he.net 
>>>> [2001:470:0:72::1]
>>>>   7    16 ms    16 ms    16 ms  
>>>> asn-qwest-us-as209.10gigabitethernet5-5.core1.lax1.he.net 
>>>> [2001:470:0:2c0::2]
>>>>   8    26 ms    26 ms    26 ms  2001:428::205:171:3:199
>>>>   9    23 ms    24 ms    25 ms  2001:428:7000:10:0:16:0:2
>>>> 10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>>> 11    42 ms    42 ms    43 ms  2620:107:3000::e
>>>> 12    42 ms    42 ms    43 ms  2620:108:7000::6
>>>> 13    42 ms    42 ms    43 ms  2620:108:7000::7
>>>> 14    42 ms    42 ms    42 ms  2620:108:7000::1
>>>> 15     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>>> 16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>>> 17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>>> 18     *       42 ms    42 ms  2620:108:700f::36f4:7ea4
>>>> IPv4
>>>> C:\Users\Sterling>tracert -4 netflix.com
>>>> Tracing route to netflix.com [54.225.192.83]
>>>> over a maximum of 30 hops:
>>>>   1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  108-165-31-1.avative.net [108.165.31.1]
>>>>   2    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  tg1-8--200.br01.lsan.acedc.net 
>>>> [69.27.173.37]
>>>>   3     4 ms     4 ms     5 ms  208.186.235.162
>>>>   4    33 ms    33 ms    34 ms  be-1.br02.chcgildt.integra.net 
>>>> [209.63.82.186]
>>>>   5    32 ms    32 ms    32 ms  equinix01-chi2.amazon.com [206.223.119.98]
>>>>   6    38 ms    42 ms    42 ms  52.95.62.36
>>>>   7    32 ms    32 ms    32 ms  52.95.62.49
>>>>   8    52 ms    52 ms    52 ms  54.239.42.63
>>>>   9    52 ms    52 ms    52 ms  54.239.42.69
>>>> 10     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>>> 11     *        *        *     Request timed out.
>>>> 12    54 ms    61 ms    67 ms  54.239.110.249
>>>> 13    53 ms    53 ms    53 ms  54.239.111.105
>>>> 14    53 ms    58 ms    55 ms  205.251.244.235
>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 4:33 PM
>>>> To: af@afmug.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] fast.com utility
>>>> further discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11722775
>>>> 
>>>> This could be useful from a residential last mile customer point of view, 
>>>> to expose ISPs which have good peering/low congestion tospeedtest.net but 
>>>> might have less than optimal routing to Netflix. Or an ISP that is flat 
>>>> topping the traffic charts on an N x 10GbE link to netflix somewhere in 
>>>> the intermediate path.
>>>> 
>>>> Some people will see radically different results from speetest vs this new 
>>>> Netflix test during peak evening hours.
>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:24 PM, Nate Burke <n...@blastcomm.com> wrote:
>>>> Just came across this https://fast.com.  Utility from netflix. Torching it 
>>>> looks like it opens 3 HTTPS connections to 3 different IP Addresses to run 
>>>> the test.  Only reports download speed, no Latency or Upload.
> 

Reply via email to