Now to figure out how to economically do 2250+ ft (about 700m) of somewhat
flexible duct through a forest...



On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:03 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> always do a duct, always. A cable of any type is always nice, but a really
> long hole is always better. When I become rich man and can put stuff in
> dirt it will always be a path for something else. Expensive containers and
> cheap removable innards, like those washable condoms of yore.
>
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:24 PM, Trey Scarborough <t...@3dsc.co> wrote:
>
>> what are you planning on using for the fiber? just laying it on the
>> ground as well. I would use liquid tight and pull through some solid 18awg
>> that would last the longest or some inch and a quarter duct and pull both
>> through.
>>
>> On 7/6/2016 1:38 PM, Jeremy wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure what kind of rodents you have there, but I definitely recommend
>>> conduit and buried.  I have seen conduit not buried through the woods
>>> and it gets squished and broken (if it is PVC) by Moose, deer, etc.  I
>>> have seen direct burial not in conduit eaten by Gophers or Voles or some
>>> crap.  Those kind of jobs are usually the type that you don't want to do
>>> twice.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com
>>> <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Use isolation transformers.  And call it a speaker wire.  You are
>>>     sending a loud 60 cycle tone.
>>>
>>>     *From:* Eric Kuhnke <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>>>     *Sent:* Wednesday, July 06, 2016 11:10 AM
>>>     *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Practical/low-cost 18AWG copper outdoor
>>>
>>>     Yeah, can't do either of those...  Burying it to Canadian electrical
>>>     code compliant depth through 700 meters (2296 ft) of forest, fallen
>>>     trees and rocks isn't going to happen. There is the slight
>>>     possibility of electrical inspection based on where the power would
>>>     be coming from.
>>>
>>>     Using a 110/240VAC input active PFC 200W power supply that can
>>>     output 54.5VDC and a DC-DC converter on the load end to bring things
>>>     back to normal 46-48VDC will work.
>>>
>>>     AC to DC meanwell RSP-200-48, $41
>>>     DC-DC meanwell SD-200C-48 $71
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Or you could buck it to 480VAC or more...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         bp
>>>         <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>
>>>         On 7/6/2016 9:34 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
>>>
>>>>         240 AC over direct burial romex.  All the power you might want.
>>>>
>>>>         *From:* Eric Kuhnke <mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
>>>>         *Sent:* Wednesday, July 06, 2016 10:29 AM
>>>>         *To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
>>>>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Practical/low-cost 18AWG copper outdoor
>>>>
>>>>         It's looking like $0.25/ft for the cable and the singlemode
>>>>         fiber is less...  Also the area is totally filled with trees,
>>>>         trees cannot be cut for various reasons, it's the side of a
>>>>         bluff on a hilltop. Branches and a few things in one
>>>>         particular direction (about 10 degrees of azimuth) would be
>>>>         cut to put in the PTP link. North of 49 latitude.
>>>>
>>>>         With DC power over 14AWG it could be enough power for up to
>>>>         75W of radios on the far end. Off grid solar to do this would
>>>>         be $4000 of panels batteries enclosure, charge controller.
>>>>
>>>>         Very challenging site for solar, if you were to camp there you
>>>>         might see 2-3 hours of direct sunlight per day max due to tree
>>>>         shading.
>>>>
>>>>         On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Bill Prince
>>>>         <part15...@gmail.com <mailto:part15...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             For that amount of cable, at 50 cents a foot, I would
>>>>             probably do a small solar setup. What is the latitude?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             bp
>>>>             <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             On 7/5/2016 4:25 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>>>>
>>>>                 Due to terrain I'm helping somebody design a network
>>>>                 link where a PTP radio will go on the side of a tree
>>>>                 on the opposite side of a mountain from where AC
>>>>                 power, a router and other network equipment is located.
>>>>
>>>>                 We're looking at 600 to 700 meters of singlemode fiber
>>>>                 and a small NEMA4X junction box with the radio on the
>>>>                 far side of the hill, containing a SC-SC patch cable
>>>>                 bulkhead and a meanwell DC-DC converter.
>>>>
>>>>                 It looks like based on the wattage of the radio and
>>>>                 voltage drop calculations for 18-2 cable that we can
>>>>                 get away with a 56VDC power supply at the power
>>>>                 source, dropping to not lower than 35VDC at the
>>>>                 receiving end, which will be fed into a DC-DC
>>>>                 converter to bring the output back up to 52.5VDC for
>>>>                 the radio.
>>>>
>>>>                 If you had to run 600-700m of 18AWG cable outdoors
>>>>                 through a forest, how would you do it? SJOOW type
>>>>                 cable may not hold up over a long enough time. Ideally
>>>>                 something that is more armored than SJOOW (it can be
>>>>                 much less flexible if needed). Cost is somewhat of a
>>>>                 factor.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to