I know of some providers hitting about half of that still on 900Mhz gear ;)
-----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: July 21, 2016 5:58 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Over subscription Rate I remember the day when we put a limit of 128 subs per AP... -----Original Message----- From: Bill Prince Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:50 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Over subscription Rate Yah. Depends on where the data hogs are. bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 7/21/2016 2:18 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: > I don't believe in over subscription rates. :) > > For planning purposes, I assume we'll get 2/3's of advertised > throughput from the AP and then plan on 8:1. > > In real life you have to abandon the over subscription rate after the > planning phase and monitor what's actually happening on the AP's. > Averaging hundreds of users together you'll get actual usage that > seems in line with an 8:1 or 6:1 ratio. On an individual AP you tend > to not have enough capacity for more than 30-50 people, so you can > easily get a few statistical outliers in the mix that make actual > consumption not line up with the planned over subscription rate. > > It goes both ways too....I've seen sites with actual over subscription > of 20:1 and everything's working ok, and other actual sites fall apart > when oversub was only 4:1. > > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Sam Morris" <w...@csilogan.com> > To: af@afmug.com > Sent: 7/21/2016 7:58:18 AM > Subject: [AFMUG] Over subscription Rate > >> At what level do you over subscribe your APs? 4:1? 8:1? 15:1? Or >> something else? >> >> Thanks >> Sam >
