The fires are clearing a lot of foliage away from the west right now...
Unfortunately it is also clearing away the houses that would have used
said service...
On 08/02/2016 01:22 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
2.4FHSS was a different beast, for whatever reason at distance it
penetrated better than 900mhz, maybe the higher power, maybe how the
frequency hopping worked, I dont know. just sucks it was 1.5mbps. 900mhz
failed 50% of the time where 320 would pick them up, and there were just
some that only worked on the FHSS, so we are stuck with 3 operational
systems that all suck.
A little more power will buy us some time with the 320 where we can
deliver a 3/2 and occasional 6/2 reliably until global warming...erpp
climate change, burns off all the trees and turns us in the midwest into
a desert and we dont have to worry about foliage or rain fade anymore
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
So what are people using to replace their 3.65 WiMAX equipment like
Cambium 320 and Purewave/Mercury? Is Bai Cells the answer? In any
case, it seems like a forklift upgrade. I would like to say some
other frequency band, but what? If not 900 MHz, it seems there is
no unlicensed band that can do what we need.
My original trip down the WiMAX rabbit hole was actually intended to
be a preliminary step toward licensed 2.5 GHz, until I found out
that was not feasible for us. But now I’ve got a lonely Purewave
basestation that I don’t want to add customers to, I don’t think the
latest Mercury help, and I don’t know what to do with the existing
customers. Some are LOS so maybe the NLOS subs just need to go bye-bye?
We are using Cambium 450 in 3.65 GHz and it is working out great for
us as a 2.4 GHz replacement, but only for LOS or through a tree or
two. Can’t afford low modulation clients <4X.
*From:* That One Guy /sarcasm <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
*Sent:* Tuesday, August 02, 2016 2:43 PM
*To:* af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Cambium 320 Revisited
one of the documents i was reading said 20% throughput loss from
extended range, thats what i was asking about real word experience
from, 320 documentation across the board was always questionable.
I would love to not use it, but 320 was the (dont start the
penetration argument) only thing at distance we could pick customers
up through foliage to get them off 2.4fhss, even 900mhz wouldnt
work, I assumed it was wimax and multipath that allowed it to happen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Eric Muehleisen <ericm...@gmail.com
<mailto:ericm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
See attached link budget sheet. Back in the day, 5%-8% capacity
loss was the number thrown around with extended range enabled.
IMO, disable extended range and deny those distance subs. You'll
increase your overall capacity as a result.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:05 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
at 10mhz we get 40 eirp correct?
Anyone using the extended range know how much real world
sector capacity loss we have? is the aggregate with loss on
10mhz going to be less than the throughput at 7mhz?
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Eric Muehleisen
<ericm...@gmail.com <mailto:ericm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes, but there is an extended range config parameter
that overcomes that limitation.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:24 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
<thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
<mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>> wrote:
at 10 mhz isnt the max distance dramatically limited
over 7mhz?
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Eric Muehleisen
<ericm...@gmail.com <mailto:ericm...@gmail.com>> wrote:
We do it like this...
A = 3655
B = 3682
C = 3669
D = 3695
It'll give you at least 1mhz separation between
sectors (which is required).
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Paul McCall
<pa...@pdmnet.net <mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net>> wrote:
Can the Cambium 320 radios operate in ABCD
fashion (10 Mhz channels using covering from
3650 to 3700) with 4 Cambium sectors? I
know AABB with splitters is common and we
did some that way, but we had to remove
splitters to get extra gain in some areas. ____
____
I seem to recall there was some “edge
issues” or something like that?? We always
lock the customer down to a given
frequency/basestation, for what that’s
worth.____
____
Paul____
____
Paul McCall, President____
PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc.____
658 Old Dixie Highway____
Vero Beach, FL 32962____
772-564-6800 <tel:772-564-6800> ____
pa...@pdmnet.net <mailto:pa...@pdmnet.net>____
www.pdmnet.com <http://www.pdmnet.com>____
www.floridabroadband.com
<http://www.floridabroadband.com>____
____
____
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you
don't see your team as part of yourself you have
already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as
part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
