last i looked at it there were all kinds of access mechanisms with snmpc. we quit paying support for it on version 7 with an umlimited perpetual license. the nodes are nice, drop them in any network and they called home, you could monitor that network.
the web interface in that was really clunky java at the time, probably not accessible with todays java issues, but man, you could do pretty much anything you wanted with it with little learning curve, and huge api options if you know that stuff but its expensive. the last i checked last year, they would cut us a deal to reactivate for 3600 dollars to upgrade to the newest greatest, but perpetual licensing is no longer a thing I dont think On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 6:34 AM, Paul Stewart <p...@paulstewart.org> wrote: > There’s a name I haven’t heard in a while .. one thing I don’t like with > SNMPc is their client thing you had to run to access the system and then if > I recall they brought out the web interface but you had to pay even more > money to get it – that was a while back and it kind of turned me off their > product. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *That One Guy > /sarcasm > *Sent:* August 5, 2016 1:41 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] network device > map/wiki/management/database/documentation > system > > > > seriously, if you have the budget, look at Castlerock SNMPc........ but > only if you have the budget... did I mention budget? if you dont have the > budget dont look at it. If you want what you want, but also have the > budget, then look at it.... otherwise, dont look at it > > > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> > wrote: > > I share your sentiment and pain....and there is a lot you are leaving out > ...related to keeping track of other bits of related information, keeping > it updated on a regular basis.... > > > > after trying lots of things... we are getting ready to pull the trigger on > this... > > > > https://www.i-doit.com/en/ > > > > It's a German Company... but the product is very interesting, very > flexible, and may get you thinking on a few other section of the business, > how you keep info, organize info etc. > > > > Do keep us posted on what you end up with. > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Sean Heskett" <af...@zirkel.us> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Thursday, August 4, 2016 6:20:09 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] network device map/wiki/management/database/ > documentation system > > Hey guys and gals, > > I don't know if something like this already exists so i thought i'd ask > y'all before i went and created it. I basically need a complete > documentation system for our network infrastructure. > > > > -we have our network mapped in visio > > -we have our network monitored in intermapper > > -we have our network graphed in cacti > > -i'm working on creating a wiki type page for all devices that has some > static info (like date put in service, a link to it's manual) and some > dynamic info (like Tx frequency) > > -the devices all typically have a web config page > > > > I want to turn our visio maps into HTML so that you can click on the > device and bring up it's wiki page that either links to all the other pages > or includes the info on that wiki page etc. > > > > it seems like this is probably just a custom documentation database. When > i search on the google there are systems kind of like this but they seem to > be either too narrow minded (geared towards data center and server > infrastructure) or too broad...nothing seems to be "just right" > > > > does something like this currently exist? what do you use to keep track > of all this information? what would you recommend? > > > > Thanks! > > > > -Sean > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
