I have looked this phrase up, but I still don't understand it.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> They may have great RF engineers, but you still cannot fit a camel through
> the eye of a needle.
>
> -----Original Message----- From: Josh Reynolds
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:04 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>
> So, I get it. You guys are sitting around feeling so smug with your WISP.
>
> We're talking about one of the largest and most powerful companies in
> the world though. Do you really think they don't have some of the best
> RF engineering talent in the world on their payroll?
>
> They're not doing anything different than many of us have done, which
> is evaluate the business case for each technology and pick the most
> appropriate one for the application. If it was going to cost you a
> couple hundred thousand just to cross an intersection, you'd be doing
> the same thing too. It's the smart play.
>
> At least they're not doing this in LEC style, which would mean "saying
> they can't do it unless they receive federal subsidies".
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller
> <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wait until they experience ducting ;)
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Bill Prince
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 11:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Google fiber going microwave?
>>
>> It's apparently "too expensive" to do underground fiber. At least in San
>> Jose.
>>
>> Anyone know anything about Webpass?
>>
>>
>> bp
>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>
>> On 8/10/2016 9:44 AM, Gino Villarini wrote:
>>
>> Google Fiber considering fixed microwave technology as alternative to
>> fiber.
>> Interesting times!
>>
>>
>> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/08/google-fiber-delays-san-jose-project-may-switch-to-wireless-instead/?comments=1
>>
>>
>
