I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course.
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > They're only 56 MHz wide. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11 > > > 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? > > I am hopeful it won't suck. > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX >> > > >
