56mhz is what they originally said, but don't the emission designators listed here indicate it'll do 80mhz?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I doubt in the year 2016 ubnt would design/build/ship a product that only > does 56 MHz ETSI size channels for an FCC/IC market... 60 and 80 are > allowed now. Coordination results permitting, of course. > > https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-12-122A1_Rcd.pdf > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> They're only 56 MHz wide. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Tuesday, September 6, 2016 7:43:38 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] AF11 >> >> >> 1024QAM, dual polarity, 80 MHz wide channels? >> >> I am hopeful it won't suck. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >> wrote: >> >>> https://fccid.io/SWX-AF11FX >>> >> >> >> >
