Well, at least in the UI, uplink frame utilization is always reported as 100% in 2.6.1. I haven't actually looked at the raw numbers via SNMP.
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. < mailing-li...@phxinternet.com> wrote: > So what I am hearing is I am reading the correct values but Uplink does > not read correctly? > > Gilbert > > On 9/12/2016 1:59 PM, Josh Baird wrote: > > Oh, and the uplink frame utilization values are not correct.. at least in > 2.6. I haven't tried 3.0 yet. > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. < > mailing-li...@phxinternet.com> wrote: > >> I am trying to identify congestion on my ePMP radios and am getting weird >> numbers. I am trying to find out how others monitor congestion. >> >> I am monitoring the following MIBs... >> >> ulWLanTotalUsedFrameTimePerSecond >> ulWLanTotalAvailableFrameTimePerSecond >> dlWLanTotalUsedFrameTimePerSecond >> dlWLanTotalAvailableFrameTimePerSecond >> >> I figure if you divide the used by the total available I should get a >> frame utilization. Downlink gives me a number, but on uplink, the two >> values are almost identical. >> >> Am I monitoring the wrong thing? >> >> Gilbert >> >> > >
