CGNAT ftw. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
> CGNAT\NAT444 and IPv6. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Saturday, September 24, 2016 11:07:07 PM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] How the cell companies do nat? > > With all of the problems that we face as wisps with doing scaled nat > behind a public IP ( Google capcha, PlayStation, blocks etc ) > > How are the cell companies (Verizon att etc) able to do nat on cellular > handsets without having the same problems? > >
