Somebody is gonna make a lot of money perfecting the whole dual stack lite/CG NAT implementation. We need an appliance.
From: Josh Reynolds Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 10:21 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] How the cell companies do nat? CGNAT ftw. On Sat, Sep 24, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: CGNAT\NAT444 and IPv6. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> To: af@afmug.com Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 11:07:07 PM Subject: [AFMUG] How the cell companies do nat? With all of the problems that we face as wisps with doing scaled nat behind a public IP ( Google capcha, PlayStation, blocks etc ) How are the cell companies (Verizon att etc) able to do nat on cellular handsets without having the same problems?
