MSRP $3799 per eNB 

$224.99 per 19.5 dBi UE

$199.99 per 11 dBi UE

$1/UE/month subscription fee for Baicells Cloud EPC

No additional licensing costs

 

Check with WAV Online, ISP Supplies Double Radius for firm pricing

In Canada, check with WAV MBSI, Alliance or Crossover

 

Respectfully,

 

Rick Harnish

Director of WISP Markets

Baicells Technologies, N.A.

Mobile: +1.972.922.1443

Email: rick.harn...@baicells.com

 <https://www.facebook.com/BaiCells> Follow us on Facebook for the latest news

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 2:03 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?

 

What is the pricing like on the Baicells gear?  Are there recurring licensing 
costs?

 

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com 
<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Baicells has a 3.65ghz version out that can still be used under the old rules. 

 

On Oct 4, 2016 12:09 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com 
<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote:

So Baicells offers 2.5GHz and 3.5GHz versions which require a license or 
arrangement with spectrum holder of these bands?   How are you guys testing 
these without investing in licenses or permits?  




Jaime Solorza

Wireless Systems Architect

915-861-1390 <tel:915-861-1390> 

 

On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com 
<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> > wrote:

Why not? You can still use a 3rd party CPE.....but if you're bringing a 
Baicells (or whatever) eNB into the mix then you'll need a separate EPC for 
that.

 

This was mentioned on the Telrad WISPA list a couple of weeks ago.

 

 

------ Original Message ------

From: "SmarterBroadband" <li...@smarterbroadband.com 
<mailto:li...@smarterbroadband.com> >

To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 

Sent: 10/4/2016 12:09:26 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?

 

Why would they do that.  That is one of their selling points, being standards 
based???

 

 

 

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com> ] On Behalf 
Of Adam Moffett
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 1:43 AM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?

 

You can use the CPE's in between them as far as I understand.

What changed with Telrad in the newest release is you can't add a non-Telrad 
base station to their EPC....which in turn means you can't use their system to 
authenticate/authorize any CPE connected to that non-Telrad BS. 

 

Ie: Telrad EPC requires Telrad BS, but other CPE are ok to use.

 

 

 

------ Original Message ------

From: "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net <mailto:af...@ics-il.net> >

To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 

Sent: 10/3/2016 11:02:14 PM

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?

 

I believe Telrad did something to break interoperability "recently".



-----
Mike Hammett
 <http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  
<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>  
<https://twitter.com/ICSIL> 
 <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> Midwest Internet Exchange
 <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>  
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>  
<https://twitter.com/mdwestix> 
 <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> The Brothers WISP
 <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>  
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> 





  _____  


From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net> >
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> 
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 10:00:38 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?

Is Telrad and Baicells interoperable? Do cpes of both work with both BS? Or is 
the decision for one of them final? I see pricing of baicells listed by 
distributors so I guess they are cheaper than Telrad.

-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Von: Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com <mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com> > 
Datum: 03.10.2016 15:42 (GMT+01:00) 
An: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>  
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ? 

We're wrestling with the same question here.  

 

M365 is inconsistent. 

 

We're testing Telrad LTE.  It's too soon to say much though.

 

 

------ Original Message ------

From: "Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net <mailto:s...@genias.net> >

To: "af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> " <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com> >

Sent: 10/3/2016 6:37:56 AM

Subject: [AFMUG] where is 3,5GHz heading to ?

 

At the moment there are the following options:

 

TDD LTE (Baicells / Telrad / Huawei)

 

PMP450 (Cambium)

 

WiMAX (Cambium/Purewave/Telrad)

 

UBNT M365 (Ubiquity)

 

WiMAX and UBNT do not have any development/future. TDD-LTE claims good NLOS 
capabilities. PMP450 claims higher sector capacity with LOS (QAM256). LTE 
claims Standards compatibility while there are not much options to select 
between. Baicell seem to bring LTE costs down to the Level of PMP450 while both 
are way above the level of wifi-based 5GHz systems. Baicell is in a 
testing/beta stage phase. PMP450 may increase performance/NLOS capability with 
cnMedusa next year. Not seen any announcements where TDD-LTE implementations 
are heading to next year. 

 

We’re still running WiMAX for NLOS as there is no clear path where to go

 

 

 

 

Reply via email to