They will, simply because most of the good .org/.net/.com are being squatted on, sometimes for millions per domain.
On Oct 10, 2016 7:59 PM, "Bruce Robertson" <[email protected]> wrote: > I think those silly long TLDs aren't going to catch on anyway. I could be > wrong of course, but at least for now I don't plan on spending a penny on > them. Gimme the old-school 2 or 3 letter TLDs. > > On 10/10/16 5:56 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote: > >> On 10/10/16 14:27, Chuck McCown wrote: >> >>> I am going to scoop up a few domain names and point them to my site. >>> Things like surgeprotectors.com are gone. Someone is camping on them. >>> >>> So, looking at variations like surge-protection >>> Adding a plural. Not sure what non alphanumeric typographical >>> characters are allowed other than the hyphen. >>> >>> Is there any prohibitions against using any TLD like .org? >>> Is a .org or .info equivalent to a .com when you are looking for stuff? >>> >>> Lots of .co, .us and .biz out there. Should be equivalent but perhaps >>> not? >>> >>> Need opinions. >>> >> >> >> There's a metric ass ton of TLDs now so none of that matters anymore. >> Except like gov and edu. >> >> You could probably even do surge.protection since that's a TLD now. >> >> I have a customer that's a contractor that started using the >> "contractors" TLD instead of the traditional ones. >> >> I registered roller.network a while back since minus the dot it's >> literally the company name. Haven't started using it because I'm not sure >> people are used to seeing TLDs like that yet. >> >> ~Seth >> >> >> !DSPAM:2,57fc115690055790173396! >> >> >> >
