I believe it's an ICANN policy rule based upon copyright laws.. It's just a policy like most of ICANN... Sorry if I made it sound like it was part of copyright law... other way around...

On 10/10/16 7:10 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
I wonder now that the US "handed over the internet" lol, how enforcable
US copyright law will be against ICANN policies

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Robert <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    There is a copyright clause that covers that..  Been tried before...

    On 10/10/16 6:42 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:

        I should setup a bot that just scans for domain expiry for the
        fortune
        500 and grabs them when they don't re-register them quick enough.


        On Oct 10, 2016 8:40 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm"
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
        <mailto:[email protected]
        <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

            ive been buying domains that small businesses i dont like
        might want
            and pointing them to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/
            <https://www.donaldjtrump.com/>  like ayerslanding.com
        <http://ayerslanding.com>
            <http://ayerslanding.com>
            they should make domains alot more expensive



            On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 8:23 PM, Josh Reynolds
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
            <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
        wrote:

                They will, simply because most of the good
        .org/.net/.com are
                being squatted on, sometimes for millions per domain.


                On Oct 10, 2016 7:59 PM, "Bruce Robertson"
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
                <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:

                    I think those silly long TLDs aren't going to catch on
                    anyway.  I could be wrong of course, but at least
        for now I
                    don't plan on spending a penny on them.  Gimme the
                    old-school 2 or 3 letter TLDs.

                    On 10/10/16 5:56 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:

                        On 10/10/16 14:27, Chuck McCown wrote:

                            I am going to scoop up a few domain names
        and point
                            them to my site.
                            Things like surgeprotectors.com
        <http://surgeprotectors.com>
                            <http://surgeprotectors.com> are gone.
        Someone is
                            camping on them.

                            So, looking at variations like surge-protection
                            Adding a plural.  Not sure what non alphanumeric
                            typographical
                            characters are allowed other than the hyphen.

                            Is there any prohibitions against using any
        TLD like
                            .org?
                            Is a .org or .info equivalent to a .com when
        you are
                            looking for stuff?

                            Lots of .co, .us and .biz out there.  Should be
                            equivalent but perhaps not?

                            Need opinions.



                        There's a metric ass ton of TLDs now so none of that
                        matters anymore. Except like gov and edu.

                        You could probably even do surge.protection
        since that's
                        a TLD now.

                        I have a customer that's a contractor that
        started using
                        the "contractors" TLD instead of the traditional
        ones.

                        I registered roller.network a while back since
        minus the
                        dot it's literally the company name. Haven't started
                        using it because I'm not sure people are used to
        seeing
                        TLDs like that yet.

                        ~Seth


                        !DSPAM:2,57fc115690055790173396!






            --
            If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
        see your
            team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
        the team.




--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to