It worked with the 320, not without its caveats, but I would think that LTE would work better. No?
On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Rick Harnish <rick.harn...@baicells.com> wrote: > You wouldn't have enough customer capacity. > > *Respectively,* > > *Rick Harnish* > *Director of WISP Markets* > *Direct: 972.922.1443* > *Baicells Technologies N.A. Inc.* > > *Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Droid* > On Oct 20, 2016 8:34 PM, Jason McKemie <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com');>> wrote: > > I just wondered if there was any reason to use the 10W version in the US. > Maybe with splitters for multiple antennas on a BS? > > On Thursday, October 20, 2016, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geo...@cbcast.com');>> wrote: > > What Rick said earlier. 3.65. There's not a chance in hell of getting 2.5 > around here. > > On 10/20/2016 4:48 PM, Jason McKemie wrote: > > Which base station are you testing with? > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:39 PM, George Skorup <geo...@cbcast.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','geo...@cbcast.com');>> wrote: > > The one eNB we have up is doing pretty good. It's our worst case test > site. We have a LOT of customers on 900 FSK. Old abandoned 75 foot cable TV > tower, so it's not even above the trees. But we're getting customers off of > 900 which is the most important thing. Getting 30Mbps to a customer that > could get only 1Mbps before is an improvement to say the least. I didn't > think it'd be viable given the height limitation and tree density, but it's > working rather well. We're going to swap out the MTI antenna for a KP and > see what we get. > > On 10/20/2016 12:22 PM, ch...@wbmfg.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@wbmfg.com');> wrote: > > Heard from one of our customers today.� He has deployed baicells and it > is doing great for NLOS up to 4 miles.� He is in pine tree country.� > > > > >
