What? 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 




----- Original Message -----

From: "Tim Reichhart" <timreichh...@hometowncable.net> 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 4:14:15 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 




I say this major ddos attack is sure blow back on what US told Ecuador to Act 
Against WikiLeaks Leader. 



-----Original Message----- 
From: "That One Guy /sarcasm" < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Date: 10/21/16 05:06 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 


i think there are only two hackers left, the rest are script kiddies 
half of these mopes calling themselves "hackers" have little education, hacking 
quite often requires a high degree of mathmatics capability, most of these l77t 
"hackers" cant even multiply 


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: 

<blockquote>

Good point … and totally agree that the word "hacking" used to mean something - 
now it just kinda makes people laugh and not take it seriously at all anymore… 






<blockquote>

On Oct 21, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Ken Hohhof < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: 



I think his point was that a denial of service attack is not hacking. 

I just heard on the radio someone was asking, if I try to use Twitter and it 
doesn't work because of this attack, is my computer how hacked? 

Even stuff that rightly gets called hacking is an insult to hackers. Like if 
your webcam is on a public IP address and I guess that the password is 1234, 
and that gets me root access to install whatever I want, it hardly seems right 
to call that hacking. 

But taking down a site by flooding it (or its authoritative DNS servers) with 
traffic is not the same as hacking the site. 




From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 3:34 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 

Agree…. it should be focused on end users better securing themselves …. 



<blockquote>


On Oct 21, 2016, at 3:44 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com 
> wrote: 



Im getting irritated by news reports calling this hacking. That term has been 
so obfuscated by dimwits that it has no value 





On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 
<blockquote>


It works great for me 90% of the time. The other 10% it refuses to function at 
all. 








Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 


On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Paul Stewart < p...@paulstewart.org > wrote: 
<blockquote>


LOL …. scary shit…. 



Facebook being slow isn't anything new in my experience … they have to be 
having a hard time keeping up sometimes …. last I heard they were adding 
something around 200-300 new servers a day in each data centre 



<blockquote>


On Oct 21, 2016, at 2:48 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com 
> wrote: 



forcing people to interact in person... a dangerous prospect in these times 



On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Tim Reichhart < timreichh...@hometowncable.net 
> wrote: 


<blockquote>



It seems like facebook is also getting slow. 

<blockquote>



-----Original Message----- 
From: "Travis Johnson" < t...@ida.net > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Date: 10/21/16 02:37 PM 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 

This is still going right now... big and small websites and ISP's are 
unreachable and unresponsive. :( 

Travis 



On 10/21/2016 12:19 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: 

<blockquote>


Interesting, according to that, the ISP DNS servers are recruited as part of 
the attack on the victim's authoritative DNS servers, by sending queries from 
within the ISP's network. 


No spoofing, no amplification, no misconfigured DNS servers required, yet the 
ISP's DNS servers are used to send the attack traffic. All that is needed is a 
compromised IoT to send the query. 



From: Af [ mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Josh Baird 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 12:42 PM 



To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 







Right - crap IoT devices on the Mirai botnet were responsible for shoving 
620+Gbps of traffic at Akamai to take down Krebs (and over 1Tbps to take down 
OVH). No spoofing involved. 




Interesting article on the techniques used by Mirai: 




https://f5.com/about-us/news/articles/mirai-the-iot-bot-that-took-down-krebs-and-launched-a-tbps-ddos-attack-on-ovh-21937
 





On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Ken Hohhof < af...@kwisp.com > wrote: 


<blockquote>



The amplifier would receive a query from a spoofed IP address, and respond 
using a legit IP address. So the attacker needs to control some computers that 
can spoof the victim's IP address, but the actual attack traffic comes from the 
amplifiers using legit source IPs. 


In the case of IoT botnets, I'm not sure any spoofing is required. 



From: Af [mailto: af-boun...@afmug.com ] On Behalf Of Josh Baird 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 12:21 PM 
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 



It's a good start. It attempts to prevent spoofed traffic originating from your 
network to leave your network (or BCP38). 




On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Josh Luthman < j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > 
wrote: 


<blockquote>


It can't be that simple...can it? 









Josh Luthman 
Office: 937-552-2340 
Direct: 937-552-2343 
1100 Wayne St 
Suite 1337 
Troy, OH 45373 






On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett < af...@ics-il.net > wrote: 
<blockquote>



/ip firewall address-list 
add list="Public-IPs" address=x.x.x.x/yy disabled=no comment="My IPs" 
add list="Public-IPs" address=x.x.x.x/yy disabled=no comment="Downstream 
customer X IPs" 

/ip firewall filter 
add action=drop chain=forward comment="Drop spoofed traffic" disabled=no 
out-interface="To-Upstream" dst-address-list=!"Public-IPs" 

That was largely composed off of the top of my head and typed on my phone, so 
it may not be completely accurate. 


You should also do it on customer-facing ports not allowing anything to come 
in, but that would be best approached once Mikrotik and the per interface 
setting for unicast reverse path filtering. You would then said customer facing 
interfaces to strict and all other interfaces to loose. They accepted the 
feature request, just haven't implemented it yet. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 







From: "Mike Hammett" < af...@ics-il.net > 
To: af@afmug.com 
Sent: Friday, October 21, 2016 11:21:35 AM 
Subject: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick 

There's another large DDoS going on now. Go to this page to see if you can be 
used for UDP amplification (or other spoofing) attacks: 

https://www.caida.org/projects/spoofer/ 

Go to these pages for more longer term bad behavior monitoring: 

https://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/ 
https://radar.qrator.net/ 


Maybe we need to start a database of ASNs WISPs are using and start naming and 
shaming them when they have bad actors on their network. This is serious, 
people. Take it seriously. 



----- 
Mike Hammett 
Intelligent Computing Solutions 

Midwest Internet Exchange 

The Brothers WISP 


















</blockquote>






</blockquote>






</blockquote>


</blockquote>


</blockquote>






-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>


</blockquote>


</blockquote>






-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>

</blockquote>


</blockquote>




-- 




If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. 
</blockquote>

Reply via email to