Hahahaha...

On Oct 21, 2016 4:11 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]>
wrote:

> *rené* ‏@Renatus84  <https://twitter.com/Renatus84> 23m23 minutes ago
> <https://twitter.com/Renatus84/status/789568998895656964>
>
> We're going to build a firewall, a huge, beautiful firewall, and hackers
> are gonna pay for it #*DDoS* <https://twitter.com/hashtag/DDoS?src=hash> #
> DDoSAttack <https://twitter.com/hashtag/DDoSAttack?src=hash>
>
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 4:06 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> i think there are only two hackers left, the rest are script kiddies
>> half of these mopes calling themselves "hackers" have little education,
>> hacking quite often requires a high degree of mathmatics capability, most
>> of these l77t "hackers" cant even multiply
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Good point … and totally agree that the word “hacking” used to mean
>>> something - now it just kinda makes people laugh and not take it seriously
>>> at all anymore…
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 4:44 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think his point was that a denial of service attack is not hacking.
>>>
>>> I just heard on the radio someone was asking, if I try to use Twitter
>>> and it doesn’t work because of this attack, is my computer how hacked?
>>>
>>> Even stuff that rightly gets called hacking is an insult to hackers.
>>> Like if your webcam is on a public IP address and I guess that the password
>>> is 1234, and that gets me root access to install whatever I want, it hardly
>>> seems right to call that hacking.
>>>
>>> But taking down a site by flooding it (or its authoritative DNS servers)
>>> with traffic is not the same as hacking the site.
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Paul Stewart
>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 3:34 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick
>>>
>>> Agree…. it should be focused on end users better securing themselves ….
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 3:44 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Im getting irritated by news reports calling this hacking. That term has
>>> been so obfuscated by dimwits that it has no value
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It works great for me 90% of the time.  The other 10% it refuses to
>>> function at all.
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Paul Stewart <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> LOL …. scary shit….
>>>
>>> Facebook being slow isn’t anything new in my experience … they have to
>>> be having a hard time keeping up sometimes …. last I heard they were adding
>>> something around 200-300 new servers a day in each data centre
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 2:48 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> forcing people to interact in person... a dangerous prospect in these
>>> times
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Tim Reichhart <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It seems like facebook is also getting slow.
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]>
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Date: 10/21/16 02:37 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick
>>>
>>> This is still going right now... big and small websites and ISP's are
>>> unreachable and unresponsive. :(
>>>
>>> Travis
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2016 12:19 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting, according to that, the ISP DNS servers are recruited as
>>> part of the attack on the victim's authoritative DNS servers, by sending
>>> queries from within the ISP's network.
>>>
>>> No spoofing, no amplification, no misconfigured DNS servers required,
>>> yet the ISP's DNS servers are used to send the attack traffic. All that is
>>> needed is a compromised IoT to send the query.
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
>>> Behalf Of* Josh Baird
>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 12:42 PM
>>>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick
>>>
>>>
>>> Right - crap IoT devices on the Mirai botnet were responsible for
>>> shoving 620+Gbps of traffic at Akamai to take down Krebs (and over 1Tbps to
>>> take down OVH). No spoofing involved.
>>>
>>> Interesting article on the techniques used by Mirai:
>>>
>>> https://f5.com/about-us/news/articles/mirai-the-iot-bot-that
>>> -took-down-krebs-and-launched-a-tbps-ddos-attack-on-ovh-21937
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> The amplifier would receive a query from a spoofed IP address, and
>>> respond using a legit IP address. So the attacker needs to control some
>>> computers that can spoof the victim's IP address, but the actual attack
>>> traffic comes from the amplifiers using legit source IPs.
>>>
>>> In the case of IoT botnets, I'm not sure any spoofing is required.
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of* Josh Baird
>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 12:21 PM
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick
>>>
>>> It's a good start. It attempts to prevent spoofed traffic originating
>>> from your network to leave your network (or BCP38).
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> It can't be that simple...can it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <http://tel:937-552-2340>
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <http://tel:937-552-2343>
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> /ip firewall address-list
>>> add list="Public-IPs" address=x.x.x.x/yy disabled=no comment="My IPs"
>>> add list="Public-IPs" address=x.x.x.x/yy disabled=no comment="Downstream
>>> customer X IPs"
>>>
>>> /ip firewall filter
>>> add action=drop chain=forward comment="Drop spoofed traffic" disabled=no
>>> out-interface="To-Upstream" dst-address-list=!"Public-IPs"
>>>
>>> That was largely composed off of the top of my head and typed on my
>>> phone, so it may not be completely accurate.
>>>
>>>
>>> You should also do it on customer-facing ports not allowing anything to
>>> come in, but that would be best approached once Mikrotik and the per
>>> interface setting for unicast reverse path filtering. You would then said
>>> customer facing interfaces to strict and all other interfaces to loose.
>>> They accepted the feature request, just haven't implemented it yet.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From:* "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>> *Sent:* Friday, October 21, 2016 11:21:35 AM
>>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] Another large DDoS, Stop Being a Dick
>>>
>>> There's another large DDoS going on now. Go to this page to see if you
>>> can be used for UDP amplification (or other spoofing) attacks:
>>>
>>> https://www.caida.org/projects/spoofer/
>>>
>>> Go to these pages for more longer term bad behavior monitoring:
>>>
>>> https://www.shadowserver.org/wiki/
>>> https://radar.qrator.net/
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe we need to start a database of ASNs WISPs are using and start
>>> naming and shaming them when they have bad actors on their network. This is
>>> serious, people. Take it seriously.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----
>>> Mike Hammett
>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>
>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL>
>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>
>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix>
>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/>
>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>>>
>>>
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to