That would be kind of awesome...

On Nov 8, 2016 8:53 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> i want trump to pull california, just to see if clinton will stand by her
> word to accept the results
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Come on, they could have called Texas 2 years ago.
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 8:41 PM That One Guy /sarcasm <
>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> by now i expected a clinton lead
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> What's wrong with Ohio? Looks fine to me...
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016 8:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> what the hell is going on in ohio?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> They are calling Texas.... Wow.   People still in line here...
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016 6:57 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yea. Nobody would believe it, nor should they.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 7:55 PM That One Guy /sarcasm <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> trump is pulling forward there now.
>>> If texas went to hillary its a given the race will be contested
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> So far Texas is 48 vs 48...JUST THAT IS DIFFERENT
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016 6:00 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> always vote! always!
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> I voted proudly... That's what count
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016 5:39 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jaimie...I sympathize with your likely feelings of irrelevance. I always
>>> vote but in such a red state it doesn't matter how you vote there are so
>>> many die hard Republicans it doesn't make a difference.
>>>
>>> I wish we could throw some libertarians in there and shake things up. We
>>> might get some appreciation.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Damn.  Eric and I are dumb....
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016 4:52 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" <
>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jaime forgot to mark his facebook selfie private
>>> [image: Inline image 1]
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow I have been called setback, beaner, spik to name a few but Trumps
>>> lackeys
>>> just came up with new one in Nevada where Latinos are voting record
>>> numbers... We are now a "certain group"....aaaugghhh ...Bad Hombre from a
>>> "certain group"!.....
>>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2016 10:18 AM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It could happen...
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, Vermin Supreme wasn't on the ballot here, but "Rocky
>>> Roque De La Fuente" was... I have no idea who he is, but he had the most
>>> impressive name of any of the candidates.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
>>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>

Reply via email to