thats should be interesting, are they going to petition on their crime rate alone?
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:13 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: > WOW Washington DC just elected to support a bid for statehood by 71%. > > On Nov 8, 2016 9:07 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> George is right. My write in might win. >> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 9:05 PM Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> If Trump won cali I would demand a recount. Josh is right. This whole >>> thing is another exampleof the electoral mess. The only thing scarier than >>> popular vote determination is the convoluted crap we are in. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 8:59 PM Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote: >>> >>> Might wanna hang out there for awhile until the toxic cloud passes. >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 8:57 PM, "George Skorup" <geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm staying in the basement with my 870 loaded until dawn. >>> >>> On 11/8/2016 8:53 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> i want trump to pull california, just to see if clinton will stand by >>> her word to accept the results >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Lewis Bergman <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Come on, they could have called Texas 2 years ago. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 8:41 PM That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> by now i expected a clinton lead >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> What's wrong with Ohio? Looks fine to me... >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 8:13 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> what the hell is going on in ohio? >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>> They are calling Texas.... Wow. People still in line here... >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 6:57 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yea. Nobody would believe it, nor should they. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 7:55 PM That One Guy /sarcasm < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> trump is pulling forward there now. >>> If texas went to hillary its a given the race will be contested >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>> So far Texas is 48 vs 48...JUST THAT IS DIFFERENT >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 6:00 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> always vote! always! >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I voted proudly... That's what count >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 5:39 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <lewis.berg...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Jaimie...I sympathize with your likely feelings of irrelevance. I always >>> vote but in such a red state it doesn't matter how you vote there are so >>> many die hard Republicans it doesn't make a difference. >>> >>> I wish we could throw some libertarians in there and shake things up. We >>> might get some appreciation. >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016, 5:58 PM Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Damn. Eric and I are dumb.... >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 4:52 PM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Jaime forgot to mark his facebook selfie private >>> [image: Inline image 1] >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com >>> > wrote: >>> >>> Wow I have been called setback, beaner, spik to name a few but Trumps >>> lackeys >>> just came up with new one in Nevada where Latinos are voting record >>> numbers... We are now a "certain group"....aaaugghhh ...Bad Hombre from a >>> "certain group"!..... >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2016 10:18 AM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> It could happen... >>> >>> Unfortunately, Vermin Supreme wasn't on the ballot here, but "Rocky >>> Roque De La Fuente" was... I have no idea who he is, but he had the most >>> impressive name of any of the candidates. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
