Paul, I think I know what your trying to do now, I think you may end up daisy chaining a couple backhauls that go across a tower (but dont feed that tower) and are basically an isolated path to get more bandwidth further out. I thought about doing this with a couple licensed backhauls when I needed to pass more than 1gbps through a tower (already has AF24's on it) and feed a further tower out so basically it was offloading some of the heavy usage towers farther down the network by providing them with their own daisy chaining hoping around all your normal drawing parts of the network. Is that what your trying to do?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: > We have done this as well, but we need more granular control than just > “splitting” the traffic. I wasn’t detailed enough I guess, of the 7 towers > that are fed through this tower, we want to feed probably (2) specific > towers. We need that granular control. > > > > Reading Faisal’s article now > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Kurt Fankhauser > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 6, 2016 1:26 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Splitting Network Traffic in an OSPF environment > > > > Paul, > > > > I have done this before and it works pretty easily. So if you want to send > half the traffic through the one backhaul and then half through another > path, just manually adjust the metric cost on the routers that are on the > closer hop count to a higher value until it is the same exact cost for > traffic to go both paths. Then it will evenly split the traffic between > paths. You have to be careuful that both backhauls have the same capacity > otherwise if one starts to peak out (might be running lower modulation) you > may get some weird results. > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com> > wrote: > > That solution is brilliant. > > > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappytelecom.net> > wrote: > > Here's an article about some innovative way to do this... > > > > http://www.stubarea51.net/2016/10/27/wisp-design-using- > ospf-to-build-a-transit-fabric-over-unequal-links/ > > > > Regards > > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Paul McCall" <pa...@pdmnet.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, December 6, 2016 11:33:42 AM > *Subject: *[AFMUG] Splitting Network Traffic in an OSPF environment > > Did get to finish this… > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul McCall > *Sent:* Tuesday, December 6, 2016 11:32 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* [AFMUG] Splitting Network Traffic in an OSPF enviroment > > > > We have a “feed tower” that feeds several other towers (some directly, > some a hop or 2 away) and its main BH (AirFiber 5x) is nearing capacity. > All 3.65 spectrum is used up, and same with 5 Ghz. The secondary that sits > largely unused (non-preferred OSPF path) has about 100Mbit capacity and we > would like to somehow split our load from the feed tower. All the > “subtowers” are on their own subnet(s) all running OSPF on a Mikrotik at > each tower. > > > > OSPF pretty much is all or nothing when picking a path. There has to be a > simple way of making this work. > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > Paul McCall, President > > PDMNet, Inc. / Florida Broadband, Inc. > > 658 Old Dixie Highway > > Vero Beach, FL 32962 > > 772-564-6800 > > pa...@pdmnet.net > > www.pdmnet.com > > www.floridabroadband.com > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Carl Peterson > > *PORT NETWORKS* > > 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553 > > Baltimore, MD 21202 > > (410) 637-3707 > > >
