Hit enter too soon. If you want two parallel PTP links between two sites, sharing traffic equally. Assuming both radio links are identical equipment and identical speed capability. Set the same OSPF cost on the router interfaces both ends.
This is logically the same thing as putting two routers next to each other in a test lab environment, and running two patch cables between them in an OSPF area 0, equal cost path configuration. On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Eric Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com> wrote: > You should not be extending layer 2 switch fabrics over PTP microwave. > > One router at each site. > > Each router gets a /32 OSPF loopback address. > > One OSPF /30 per radio link. > > The only MAC addresses that should exist on the radio link (which is > itself a L2 bridge) are the single MACs for the router interfaces on each > end. > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have my network setup with a common bridge (bridgeWAN) setup on each >> router in an area. The backhaul in goes into this bridge and any backhauls >> to further sites do as well. OSPF sorts out the default path and the bridge >> gets them there in one IP hop. I have a major site that I am added a second >> backhaul link to the upstream direction today (Airfiber 5x multiplexer for >> the win). I am trying to figure out how to bond these two backhauls from >> bridgeWAN on router A to bridgeWAN on router B. Any way to share the load >> across those links would be great. If I just plug them in spanning tree >> shuts one down. The real kink in the works may be that they have different >> capacities. What can I do? >> >> >> -Ty >> > >
