I'm amazed at the new white house press secretary flat out fucking lying about how many people were at the inauguration. What fucking balls! LOL. There is time lapse video from several sources.. pictures from previous events, etc.
That said, this transition is fucking terrifying. Very few nuclear and security positions filled... That's a problem. There will be gaps of 6 months to a year before people will ever show up to work after having their names thrown in, let alone get up to speed. A lot of the people he wants confirmed it seems have _serious_ ethics issues. I actually want to give Trump a chance. I think it's the right thing to do. So far, he's breaking all of his campaign promises and not draining the swamp but making it far, far worse. The only people that have been submitted for consideration besides ole Mad Dog (great pick btw) are business associates, other billionaires and super-millionaires, etc... People that have him a lot of money for his campaign, were in business deals with him, etc. "Obama founded ISIS. He's the founder." Talks about how the policy against ISIS is terrible, he knows exactly how to handle it, etc. Then keeps the Obama strategy architect against ISIS with no plan on how to replace him. "We're going to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it." American people will now be paying for said wall. "From day one, no more amnesty, we'll be rounding them up and shipping them out " (Paraphrased) No action there... "On day one we'll be cancelling Executive Orders for X" (Nothing yet...) Lock her up! Lock her up! (No going to do it...) "I'll release my tax returns" (Nope... And it may be because of the IRS, I'll give him that..) "I'll be removing myself from my business involvement" (Not quite... He's turning some functions over to his kids and then having them involved in policy mettings...) The irony of this, and how messed up it all is would be hilarious if it wasn't so terrifying. I feel like this campaign was ran on WWE style promos and done as a business decision. He's still getting settled in, but things sure aren't looking good... On Jan 22, 2017 8:43 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. > https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm. > huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 > > On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. The >> bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let >> me Trumpspeak... So sad. >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> there is this gem now >>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very >>>> difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be >>>> very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in >>>> USA is biased, too. >>>> >>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it >>>> was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable >>>> here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and >>>> would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion >>>> away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable. >>>> >>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which >>>> is minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >>>> >>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >>>> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem >>>> than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >>>> reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure >>>> you have a problem. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to >>>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current >>>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA >>>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and >>>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of getting >>>> information. We know more in real time then the press could ever package up >>>> and present. The current mindset of media in press conferences is that of >>>> militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero professionalism >>>> from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, >>>> theyre going to report whatever their preconceived response was either way. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Answer: Yes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 >>>> ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those >>>> who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >>>> transition of power. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >>>> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous >>>> time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >>>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >>>> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime >>>> charges possible? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 >>>> ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS >>>> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by >>>> the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >>>> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's >>>> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with >>>> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >>>> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >>>> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >>>> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>
