https://streamable.com/md28v
I still cannot settle down with the idea that a Trump presidency is not some kind of joke taken too far... On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 8:43 AM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Waiting on Tweets Trump or Trumps Tweet response to this.. > https://news.google.com/news/amp?caurl=http%3A%2F%2Fm. > huffpost.com%2Fus%2Fentry%2Fus_5884a06be4b096b4a2325818%2Famp#pt0-568751 > > On Jan 22, 2017 7:40 AM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hey but you can buy Melanias jewelry line on new white house website. The >> bullshit is going to get worse...no million and half attended >> inauguration.... Women's March had a lot more... His ego is bruised. Let >> me Trumpspeak... So sad. >> >> On Jan 22, 2017 12:47 AM, "That One Guy /sarcasm" < >> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> there is this gem now >>> http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/ >>> 24x7 real time stream of people being idiots ala transformers guy >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Today we’ve great possibilities to spread news. But it is very >>>> difficult to get the real information unbiased. Breitbart is known to be >>>> very biased even here over the ocean. But it seems the „normal“ media in >>>> USA is biased, too. >>>> >>>> E.g. we never understood how Bush jun. got his second election where it >>>> was clear he started a war based on wrong information. This is unthinkable >>>> here. It would be the one point which would dominate the discussion and >>>> would make him unvotable here. Your media seemed to move the discussion >>>> away from this fact and relativated his guilty to make him votable. >>>> >>>> Another example is the Hillary Email discussion. This is a topic which >>>> is minor at best but was discussed the whole time. >>>> >>>> I guess it is possible Trump kills a person in TV and get reelected if >>>> media helps him. Unthinkable? But killing one person is much less a problem >>>> than starting a war where thousands are killed. Breitbart would find 100 >>>> reasons why this person has to die and would find other topics to report. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Good and neutral media are the base of a working democracy. For sure >>>> you have a problem. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *That One Guy >>>> /sarcasm >>>> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 22. Januar 2017 07:05 >>>> *An:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] [OT: Politics] Can we? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Im pretty confident the next few days is setting the stage to >>>> effectively shutting down "media access". Im all for it in the current >>>> environment. Between press releases, Publicly accessible data, FOIA >>>> responses, live streamed events, and one on one interviews (and >>>> yes...twitter) the press really is the dialup internet method of getting >>>> information. We know more in real time then the press could ever package up >>>> and present. The current mindset of media in press conferences is that of >>>> militants (both sides of the media isle) and there is zero professionalism >>>> from either one. Neither really gives a damn what the answer is anyway, >>>> theyre going to report whatever their preconceived response was either way. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Question: Did we send B52 Bombers to hit an ISIS target? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Answer: Yes >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> CNN under Obama: Obama authorizes successful airstrike removing 100 >>>> ISIS fighters in final days of his presidency. This act ensures that those >>>> who would commit terror will be addressed accordingly, even during the >>>> transition of power. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Breitbart under Obama: Obama, the snake furthers military conflict day >>>> before leaving office, leaving all Americans at risk during a tumultuous >>>> time of transition. Kills 100, ensuring a retaliatory response. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Had the same attack been authorized today: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> CNN under Trump: MILITARY FIASCO: Trump bombs random targets. Top >>>> military officials, speaking on condition of anonymity, refuse to verify >>>> there were no civilian casualties, at least 100 confirmed dead. War crime >>>> charges possible? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Breitbart under Trump: God Emperor Trump authorized the removal of 100 >>>> ISIS top leaders in his first act as Commander in Chief. Rumors of ISIS >>>> surrender. Barack Obama potentially one of the dead operatives. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 11:45 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm all for it. I think that everyone is probably just impressed by >>>> the first white house press briefing and the remarks at Langley. What an >>>> amazing public speaker this one is. Have you ever had a friend or friend's >>>> uncle or something who did too much meth? You know how they start out with >>>> one sentence and then before you know it they have told fifteen other >>>> stories before they ever get to the point...if they ever do??? We have >>>> four years of that to look forward to. Just watch the full speech at the >>>> CIA, you will see what I mean. Or don't....save yourself the pain. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can we talk about politics yet? :P >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>
