More packets = more headers that can be compressed

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Huh? More packets = more overhead. Less packets = less overhead.
>
> On Feb 15, 2017 10:37 AM, "Jon Langeler" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I think you have those numbers flipped. It does more speed with small
>> packets.
>>
>> Jon Langeler
>> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>>
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> At 1024QAM it does 761Mbps LG packets and 486Mbps SM packets.  When I ran
>> TCP speed tests on the link I got 750Mbps though.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> No, it is 1024.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Josh Luthman <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is that 2048, Jeremy?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Luthman
>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>>> Suite 1337
>>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Jeremy <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Our 6GHz Trango link does 750Mbps FDX on a 60MHz channel width.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:55 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No but it’s the middle of Phoenix, I’d be surprised if it was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jeff
>>>>>> Broadwick - Lists
>>>>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 15, 2017 5:06 AM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *To:* [email protected]
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did you check and see if there is a 60MHz channel available in 6GHz
>>>>>> Rory?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeff Broadwick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 312-205-2519 <(312)%20205-2519> Office
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 574-220-7826 <(574)%20220-7826> Cell
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:39 AM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will the Cambium 820 support that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On
>>>>>> Behalf Of George Skorup
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 11:25 PM
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IIRC, there are 10 channel pairs on the 40MHz channel plan for 18GHz.
>>>>>> You could always do 2+0 if there are two channels available on your
>>>>>> proposed path.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/15/2017 12:06 AM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 12 miles.  Needs 4' dishes minimum but I didn't ask about both
>>>>>> polarities.  Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rory
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] On
>>>>>> Behalf Of Trey Scarborough
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2017 10:05 PM
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 18GHz licensed
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm Xpic if you can get 40mhz on H and V. are you trying to make this
>>>>>>
>>>>>> go
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 30 miles though...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/14/2017 10:17 PM, Rory Conaway wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a link where only 40MHz is available.  What would my best
>>>>>>
>>>>>> option be to get more than 500Mbps out of it?  2048QAM is limited to
>>>>>> 347Mbps.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Rory Conaway **� Triad Wireless �**CEO*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *4226 S. 37^th Street � Phoenix � AZ 85040*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *602-426-0542 <(602)%20426-0542>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]
>>>>>> <[email protected]>>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *www.triadwireless.net <http://www.triadwireless.net/>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> �The successful man is the one who finds out what is the matter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with his business before his competitors do.� - Roy L. Smith
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>

Reply via email to