When it come to gear in the rack a single lug on most 1u/2u gear is ok for grounding inside the cabinet.

On 02/26/2017 02:08 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:

1/4-20 and 5/8 spacing works for me, I don’t think you can satisfy everyone. I would even be OK with a single ground screw, but some people will make a reasonable case that a 2-hole lug is better, and you can still use a single hole lug if that’s all you have.

The ground bars in shelters and at towers are typically going to have dual 3/8 screws and wires will be #2 or heavier, but that is overkill for what you are doing.

*From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *David Milholen
*Sent:* Sunday, February 26, 2017 9:31 AM
*To:* af@afmug.com
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Ground Lugs

Forrest,

 Use the motorola R56 standards for a base for all your grounding.

There are a few layered standards for grounding but motorola is on top of these other standards for telcom gear.

I have always tried to be a good steward of these standards when using existing sites but the Broadcaster towers built pre 1990

are a big challenge.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj589iAiq7SAhWK5oMKHeHwCwUQFgggMAE&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsites.auburn.edu%2Fadmin%2Ffacilities%2Fspw-bid-calendar%2F11-150%2520AU%2520Regional%2520Airport-Construct%2520a%2520Self-Supporting%2520Radio%2520Tower%2FProject%2520Documents%2F1%2FMotorola_R56_2005_manual.pdf&usg=AFQjCNHlYoTBfjY-zLOUUebdvd3RLH_Cwg&sig2=gZT9-oejY-fxgK2TrdRnWQ

There are 518 pages of stuff but do a search for Rack and Rack equipment grounding and you should find what you need.


Dave

On 2/25/2017 10:12 PM, Forrest Christian (List Account) wrote:

    So, I've now had two people ask me to include a ground strap point
    on the back of the new rack injectors.   So I figured, I'd just go
    figure out what the standard was for the hole spacing, screw
    diameter, and similar, and add it to the list of things which will
    be modified slightly in a future batch of enclosures - shouldn't
    be much more expensive to get them to mask off a small section
    when painting and add the appropriate screw bosses....

    Simple, right?

    Well, that was until I tried to find the standard.....

    In a juniper manual I discovered they have two sets of bosses....
    one with 1/4-20 screws, one with M6 Screws... the 1/4-20 screws
    are for the US market and the M6 ones are for the European market.
      Ok, I get that... Metric vs US.   But then the spacing is 0.625
    (5/8) inches for *both* of them - not say for instance 0.625in and
    15 or 16mm which would make sense.     So I figured I'd look
    around more...

    Then I go over to the cisco manual.   They use M4x8 screws on most
    stuff, sometimes something different.  Spacing seems to be around
    1"  (freakin metric screw and english spacing).

    After 2-3 more vendors of total inconsistency, a word comes to
    mind:  Cobblefuckery. Pure Cobblefuckery.  WTF?   I thought this
    was for grounding in a Telco environment, and shouldn't this be
    specified out the wazoo by telcordia, with all of the vendors
    falling over backwards to make their equipment NEBS compliant with
    exactly the right hole spacing for grounding?  Maybe two competing
    standards for English vs Metric, but not as it seemed, everyone
    making up their own crap.  Although the 5/8" spacing and 1/4" or
    M6 screws seemed to be slightly more common than all of the other
    pure randomness I was finding.

    So the NEBS thought lead me down the rathole of telecom
    standards.  Eventually I find ANSI/TIA-607-B - it looks like the
    5/8" spacing and the 1" spacing are both specified in
    ANSI/TIA-607-B for grounding busbars.  The hole diameter for the
    5/8 spacing holes is specified as 5/16" on the busbars, which
    seems to be a good match for a 1/4-20 screw.  So it seems like the
    juniper spec of 1/4-20 on 5/16 spacing would match a lug designed
    for a ANSI/TIA-607-B compliant busbar.   The M6 would be fine too
    - just a bit smaller...  The spec also lists 8mm holes on 16mm
    spacing as a option for the exact same holes which I guess would
    be close enough since we're really only talking about a millimeter
    or so here - probably a bit more or less slop, but still close
    enough to work.

But what about that cisco spec of 1" spacing with a M4 screw? I'm still not sure WTF they were thinking. ANSI/TIA-607 specs a
    11mm diameter hole at 1" spacing.  A M4 screw isn't going to work
    well in a 11mm hole.    Cisco... go figure.

    At this point, my intent is to see about including two 1/4"-20
    screw holes spaced at 7/16" and appropriate bare metal in a future
    revision of the rackinjectors.  Does anyone have any reason why
    this isn't the right spacing and hole diameters?   Or maybe even
    some validation that I got this right?

--
    *Forrest Christian*/CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc./

    Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602

    forre...@imach.com <mailto:forre...@imach.com> |
    http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.packetflux.com/>

    Image removed by sender. <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian>
    Image removed by sender. <http://facebook.com/packetflux> Image
    removed by sender. <http://twitter.com/@packetflux>

    Image removed by sender.Image removed by sender.Image removed by
    sender.

--


--

Reply via email to